2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19678.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gamma-ray burst distances and the timescape cosmology

Abstract: Gamma‐ray bursts can potentially be used as distance indicators, providing the possibility of extending the Hubble diagram to redshifts ∼7. Here we follow the GRB analysis of Schaefer, with the aim of distinguishing the timescape cosmological model from the Λ cold dark matter (ΛCDM) model by means of the additional leverage provided by Gamma‐ray bursts (GRBs) in the range 2 ≲z≲ 7. We find that the timescape model fits the GRB sample slightly better than the ΛCDM model, but that the systematic uncertainties are… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(44 reference statements)
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this itself does not constitute a proof of the standard kinematic interpretation, but rather a verification within the 20% uncertainty of a computer simulation. The ΛCDM model is certainly phenomenologically very successful, and any competing model can only be viable insofar as many of its predictions are close to the standard model, as is the case, for example, in the timescape cosmology (Wiltshire 2009;Smale & Wiltshire 2011;Smale 2011;. What is important in testing the standard model is to seek observations which are not expected in its framework.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this itself does not constitute a proof of the standard kinematic interpretation, but rather a verification within the 20% uncertainty of a computer simulation. The ΛCDM model is certainly phenomenologically very successful, and any competing model can only be viable insofar as many of its predictions are close to the standard model, as is the case, for example, in the timescape cosmology (Wiltshire 2009;Smale & Wiltshire 2011;Smale 2011;. What is important in testing the standard model is to seek observations which are not expected in its framework.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The timescape model has passed a number of independent observational tests (Leith, Ng & Wiltshire 2008;Smale & Wiltshire 2011;Smale 2011;Duley, Nazer & Wiltshire 2013;Nazer & Wiltshire 2015). Its distance-redshift relation is very close to that of particular Λ cold dark matter (ΛCDM) models over small redshift ranges, but effectively interpolates (Wiltshire 2009(Wiltshire , 2014 between spatially flat ΛCDM cosmologies with different values of Ω M 0 and Ω Λ0 over larger redshift ranges.…”
Section: Inhomogeneous Alternatives To Dark Energymentioning
confidence: 95%
“…After a variety of observational tests [5][6][7][8] the timescape model remains a viable alternative to the standard model. On large scales its expansion history is so close to that of the standard model that differences in luminosity distances are at the level of current systematic uncertainties in type Ia supernova data [6]; which model fits better depends on the method by which supernova light curves are reduced.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%