2017
DOI: 10.1186/s12885-017-3236-2
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gamma probe and ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration cytology of the sentinel node (GULF) trial - overview of the literature, pilot and study protocol

Abstract: BackgroundSentinel node (SN) biopsy (SNB) detects clinically occult metastases of breast cancer and melanoma in 20–30%. Wound infections, seroma and lymph edema occur in up to 10%. Targeted ultrasound (US) of the SN, (with fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) if appropriate) has been investigated as a minimally invasive alternative, but reported sensitivity rates are too low to replace SNB. Our hypothesis is that the use of a handheld gamma probe concomitant with US may improve sensitivity.Our aim is to prov… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
(11 reference statements)
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Mini 900 scintillation monitor with a sodium iodide crystal was used on 44 samples, and showed a signal more than twice the background signal in 75% of the samples. This supports the high accuracy of SN identification using FNAC with gamma probe and US guidance, as was previously demonstrated in the trial phase with a correct identification rate of 90% [ 12 ]. A signal equal to or lower than the background count does not necessarily mean that the sample is not radioactive, but could be a result of a higher background count that occurs occasionally or a low sample volume.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The Mini 900 scintillation monitor with a sodium iodide crystal was used on 44 samples, and showed a signal more than twice the background signal in 75% of the samples. This supports the high accuracy of SN identification using FNAC with gamma probe and US guidance, as was previously demonstrated in the trial phase with a correct identification rate of 90% [ 12 ]. A signal equal to or lower than the background count does not necessarily mean that the sample is not radioactive, but could be a result of a higher background count that occurs occasionally or a low sample volume.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…This illustrates the difficulty in the broad implementation of the technique. It is noteworthy that in most previous studies investigating the sensitivity of US-guided FNAC, FNAC was performed only if there was suspicion of metastasis on US examination [ 12 ]. This increases the likelihood of a positive FNAC considerably and explains some of the higher reported sensitivity rates, and might explain our sensitivity rate since we performed FNAC regardless of suspicion of metastasis on US examination.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations