2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.lfs.2006.11.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gamma-decanolactone effect on behavioral and genotoxic parameters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the damage index could range from 0 (completely undamaged, 100 cells × 0) to 400 (with maximum damage, 100 × 4). The damage frequency (%) was calculated based on number of cells with tail versus those with no tail [27].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the damage index could range from 0 (completely undamaged, 100 cells × 0) to 400 (with maximum damage, 100 × 4). The damage frequency (%) was calculated based on number of cells with tail versus those with no tail [27].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thirty minutes after the first administration of vehicle or PSAE, the mice were placed in the rear left square and allowed to explore the environment for 5 min (training session). Latency to start the locomotion, crossing of black lines, and rearing times were counted and used as measurements of motivation, locomotion, and exploration, respectively [ 17 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Long-term retention of habituation to a novel environment can be considered a type of learning. A decrease in rearing between the first and second exploration sessions was considered to be a measure of habituation [ 17 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Long‐term retention of habituation to a novel environmental can be considered a type of learning. The decrease in the number of rearing performed between the first and the second exploration sessions was considered as a measure of habituation .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The damage index (DI) can range from 0 (completely undamaged, 100 cells × 0) to 400 (with maximum damage, 100 × 4). Damage frequency (DF) was calculated based on the number of cells with tail versus those with no tails .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%