2020 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/fie44824.2020.9274176
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gaming4All: Reflecting on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion for Game-Based Engineering Education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thought bubbles can also be viewed as a form of reflection, and reflection can be used to improve learning [45]. Therefore, future research can look into opportunities in which thought bubbles can be utilized for reflection in game-based learning technologies [43]. For all this to work, we need to think about how to scale up the use of thought bubbles with respect to qualitative analysis, which is a time-consuming process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thought bubbles can also be viewed as a form of reflection, and reflection can be used to improve learning [45]. Therefore, future research can look into opportunities in which thought bubbles can be utilized for reflection in game-based learning technologies [43]. For all this to work, we need to think about how to scale up the use of thought bubbles with respect to qualitative analysis, which is a time-consuming process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The discussion on DEI may go way beyond what is presented in this essay. Aspects not covered here include: institutional initiatives, infrastructure issues and disability challenges [6], culturally relevant Computing pedagogy [33], specific education methodologies such as game-based [21], DEI at school level Computing [59], and open source community benefits [56].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To examine attainment of our goal of engaging a diverse audience, we reviewed the outcomes across gender and race/ethnicity. We did not find any differences [40], suggesting that our approach is suitable for everyone and does not create equity issues.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 64%