2018 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/glocom.2018.8647406
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Game Theoretic Switch-Controller Mapping with Traffic Variations in Software Defined Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This method not only balances the load between controllers but also solves the problem of load oscillation. Mohanasundaram et al [15] proposed game theoretic switch-controller mapping with traffic variations in software-defined networks, describing the problem as a Markov decision process, reducing frequent migration between controllers and obtaining a stable mapping relationship. Wang et al [16] proposed a switch migration-based decision-making scheme, which considered the load balancing degree and migration cost and achieved a compromise between the two performance indicators.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method not only balances the load between controllers but also solves the problem of load oscillation. Mohanasundaram et al [15] proposed game theoretic switch-controller mapping with traffic variations in software-defined networks, describing the problem as a Markov decision process, reducing frequent migration between controllers and obtaining a stable mapping relationship. Wang et al [16] proposed a switch migration-based decision-making scheme, which considered the load balancing degree and migration cost and achieved a compromise between the two performance indicators.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Algorithm Design: To address the CSP, different algorithms have been proposed, ranging from exact methods [206,258] to heuristics [38,56,66,74,80,278,307,308]. However, these algorithms were mostly designed for switch level CS, i.e., the CS decision is made for each switch.…”
Section: Challenges For the Cspmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these algorithms were mostly designed for switch level CS, i.e., the CS decision is made for each switch. In comparison, when CS is performed at a per-request level, its complexity increases significantly, rendering the efficiency and effectiveness of existing algorithms questionable (e.g., dynamic programming in [206] and simulated annealing in [38]). Recently, Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) has demonstrated its potential on tackling challenging scheduling tasks [67,135,185,194].…”
Section: Challenges For the Cspmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations