Game Theoretic Choices Between Corrupt Dictatorship Exit Emoluments and Nation-Building CDR Benefits: Is There a Nash Equilibrium?

Abstract

Recent developments in economic theory have established that gross domestic product (GDP) is determined almost entirely by the institutions of capitalism, democracy, and rule of law (CDR). To raise GDP, a corrupt dictator-led country must raise its CDR index. Its corrupt ruler aims to maximize his personal wealth in what he perceives to be a zero sum game. He maximizes personal wealth from a certainty undeserved large share of low GDP versus a deserved small share of high GDP, the former share being larger than the latter in absolute value. We explore the question of how to pay off the corrupt dictator with an emolument, conditional on the dictator reforming or leaving the country, and replaced by a democratically elected government. A game is designed such that when played, it reveals the Nash equilibrium emolument that the reformed or exiting corrupt leader and the entering nation-builders will agree to. JEL Classifications: A20, A22

Collaboration Trumps Intelligence as a Predictor of Standard of Living

“…See Acemoglu, et al (2019) for more on democracy and economic growth. Ridley and de Silva (2019) show how to remove corrupt dictators so as to raise the CDR index.…”

Economic Development via Collaborating Populations

“…Many decisions that relate to development projects require a democratic process as an element of collaboration. Ridley and de Silva (2019) show how corrupt dictatorship is an obstacle to economic growth. Such a democratic process may require voting on projects to be chosen.…”

Collective Strategy Condensation: When Envy Splits Societies

“…Our study can be seen as a generalization of evolutionary game theory, which is dedicated in good part to the origins of behavioral traits [ 18 ], and to the emergence of class structures. Other alternatives include dynamical system investigations of the stability of societies [ 19 ], and game theoretical approaches centered on selected key societal players [ 20 ].…”