Game, Set and Match? Substantive Issues and Future Directions in Performance Analysis

Abstract

This article discusses the main substantive issues surrounding performance analysis and considers future directions in this recently formed sub-discipline of sport science. It is argued that it is insufficient to bring together sport biomechanics and notational analysis on the basis that they share a number of commonalities, such as they both aim to enhance performance, they both make extensive use of information and communications technology, and both are concerned with producing valid and reliable data. Rather, it is suggested that the common factor linking sport biomechanics and notational analysis is that they can both be used to measure and describe the same phenomenon (i.e. emergent pattern formation) at different scales of analysis (e.g. intra-limb, inter-limb and torso, and inter-personal). Key concepts from dynamical system theory, such as self-organization and constraints, can then be used to explain stability, variability and transitions among coordinative states. By adopting a constraints-based approach, performance analysis could be effectively opened up to sport scientists from other sub-disciplines of sport science, such as sport physiology and psychology, rather than solely being the preserve of sport biomechanists and notational analysts. To conclude, consideration is given to how a more unified approach, based on the tenets of dynamical systems theory, could impact on the future of performance analysis.

Space protection dynamics in basketball: Validation and application to the evaluation of offense-defense patterns

“…Moreover, the analysis of SCD-SPD couples helps to explain the causative processes that affect the outcomes. This analysis is supported by the literature, which reinforces the importance of shifting from a discrete action analysis to a continuous goal-directed behavior analysis (Correia et al, 2013;Glazier, 2010;McGarry, 2009). A possible limitation of the methodology is that to accomplish demands of describing the actions' semantics, it necessarily requires the identification of specialized tactical patterns (e.g., SCDs and SPDs, such as an on ball screen) in the midst of several events in a match.…”

A systemic overview of football game: The principles behind the game — ; ; Mendes, Rui Sousa; Figueiredo, António José

“…Therefore, a dynamical system is a system where the state changes over time (Araújo, 2006). Dynamical system theory may offer a greater scope and potential for scientific endeavour in performance analysis (Glazier, 2010). Therefore, dynamical systems can be interpreted either via a mathematical and physics-based conception.…”

The wider context of performance analysis and it application in the football coaching process

“…However at the time Bartlett (2001) also established a number of challenges requiring attention in the future thereby enabling 'a real fusion of the two disciplines' (Bartlett 2001:5) Although both biomechanics and notational analysis share some commonalities as described by both Bartlett (2001) andGlazier (2010), criticism has emerged from some quarters describing such a joining as a 'marriage of convenience' (Glazier 2010:1). Contention appears to be caused by a perceived 'dumbing down' (Glazier 2010:1) of biomechanical principles while physiologists and psychologists might also perceive themselves as performance analysts in their own right. The authors of this paper strongly argue against what has been described as the 'dumbing down' and support the wider applications of notational analysis, match analysis and time motion analysis techniques by a range of different sports scientists and performance coaches in many applied settings.…”