2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101528
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Game analysis of charging service fee based on benefit of multi-party participants: A case study analysis in China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Yang et al [10] analyzed the impact of different charging facility subsidy policies on the economics of charging model choices, and found land lease fees are an important barrier limiting the development of charging facilities, and a 7 kW slow charging mode is more appropriate in the current subsidy. Zhang et al [31] analyzed the impact of government subsidies on the pricing of charging service fees, and found government subsidies can help reduce the high investment cost of charging facilities and facilitate multiparty cooperation to reduce charging service fees. Fang et al [5] analyzed how government subsidies affect the competition between charging stations and gas stations, and found government subsidies help avoid market fluctuations in charging facilities.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Yang et al [10] analyzed the impact of different charging facility subsidy policies on the economics of charging model choices, and found land lease fees are an important barrier limiting the development of charging facilities, and a 7 kW slow charging mode is more appropriate in the current subsidy. Zhang et al [31] analyzed the impact of government subsidies on the pricing of charging service fees, and found government subsidies can help reduce the high investment cost of charging facilities and facilitate multiparty cooperation to reduce charging service fees. Fang et al [5] analyzed how government subsidies affect the competition between charging stations and gas stations, and found government subsidies help avoid market fluctuations in charging facilities.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the role of electricity and fuel prices has been identified by many studies, and these two factors are indeed cost factors that influence consumers' vehicle choices, the rational use of these two influencing factors has not been considered in depth, and there is a lack of rational application of this power in real-life applications (Li et al, 2019;Hu et al, 2020a). In China, the service price of charging facilities is not regulated by the government, and fewer charging facilities enterprises have not yet formed a competitive pattern, and the local monopoly is not conducive to reasonable competition in tariff (Zhang et al, 2019;Zhao et al, 2020). Therefore, reasonable tariff setting is still a problem that has yet to be solved and directly affects the market acceptance of EVs.…”
Section: The Analysis Of Policiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their results indicate that the charging price is heavily influenced by the operating cost, electricity price, and charging volume. In a subsequent work [31], they propose a game theoretic modelling to decide the EV public charging pricing, considering the interests of government, consumers and charging facility operators. The model is applied in different regions of China and the results suggest that governmental subsidies to charging station operators positively affect the uptake of EVs.…”
Section: Literature Review and Motivation For Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%