2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2020.06.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gambling harm is everybody's business: A public health approach and call to action

Abstract: There is a growing consensus that gambling is a public health issue and that preventing gambling related harms requires a broad response. Although many policy decisions regarding gambling are made at a national level in the UK, there are clear opportunities to take action at local and regional levels to prevent the negative impacts on individuals, families and local communities. This response goes beyond the statutory roles of licencing authorities to include amongst others the National Health Service (NHS), t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If national and local policymakers accept that substance use disorders may require several intervention components, they should accept them also in gambling issues (Jemberie et al, 2020). A public health model addresses not only individual harm, but also the commercial and social determinants of harm, such as availability, accessibility, marketing, and risk factors that also cause harm amongst low and moderate risk gamblers (Griffiths et al, 2009;Johnstone & Regan, 2020). According to the prevention paradox argument, most harm accrues to the low or moderate risk population who also benefit most from interventions (e.g., .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If national and local policymakers accept that substance use disorders may require several intervention components, they should accept them also in gambling issues (Jemberie et al, 2020). A public health model addresses not only individual harm, but also the commercial and social determinants of harm, such as availability, accessibility, marketing, and risk factors that also cause harm amongst low and moderate risk gamblers (Griffiths et al, 2009;Johnstone & Regan, 2020). According to the prevention paradox argument, most harm accrues to the low or moderate risk population who also benefit most from interventions (e.g., .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A growing body of evidence has started to address the factors that lead to sports betting being perceived as an everyday part of sports, fostering its uptake. This is aligned with an increasing focus within broader gambling research on the influence of the environment and social determinants on people’s behaviour, as opposed to concentrating on a problem or pathology within the individual (Johnston and Regan, 2020 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Public health issues within areas of socio-economic disadvantage, including poorer mental health (Wickham et al, 2014); health issues and inequalities (Williams, 2017); and loneliness and isolation (Macdonald et al, 2018) are likely implicated. Indeed, problem gambling is also associated with mental health symptoms (Dowling et al, 2019); health inequalities (Johnstone & Regan, 2020); and loneliness (John et al, 2019) -and a 'whole systems approach' has been called for in tackling gambling-related harm within areas of deprivation (Johnstone & Regan, 2020). While recognising the importance of this, this current study takes an individualised perspective, as perceived relative deprivation is a highly individualised construct (Mishra & Novakowski, 2016), which focusing solely on social/public-health perspectives can overlook (Delfabbro & King, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%