Gambling formats, involvement, and problem gambling: which types of gambling are more risky?

Abstract

Background: The recognition of problem gambling as a public health issue has increased as the availability of gambling expands. Research has found that some formats of gambling are more closely linked to problem gambling than others. Conflicting evidence, however, has emerged, suggesting that the most important consideration is involvement (i.e., number of gambling formats an individual participates in). This debate has important implications for the regulation of gambling formats and for the allocation of problem gambling prevention and treatment services. Method: Analyses utilized the Baseline General Population Survey (BGPS) and the Baseline Online Panel Survey (BOPS) of Massachusettscollected in 2013-2014. The BGPS contains a representative sample of 9523 Massachusetts adults and the BOPS contains a sample of 5046 Massachusetts adults. All participants were administered the same comprehensive survey of their past year gambling behavior and problem gambling symptomology. Only those who gambled regularly in the past 12 months (n = 5852) were included. The Problem and Pathological Gambling Measure was used to classify gambling behavior. Within the sample, there were 446 problem gamblers. We assessed: 1) whether some gambling formats are more related to problem gambling; 2) whether problem gambling is positively related to high involvement in gambling; 3) the relationship between involvement in gambling and intensity of gambling; and 4) whether gambling formats mediate the relationship between gambling involvement and problem gambling. Results: Groups of monthly gamblers participating in casino gambling, bingo, and sports betting contained a higher proportion of problem gamblers. High gambling involvement was also positively associated with problem gambling; however, a large minority of gamblers experienced problems when engaging in only one or two forms of gambling. Gambling involvement was also positively associated with intensity of gambling. Therefore, intensity of gambling may be partly driving the relationship between involvement and problem gambling. Specific gambling formats mediated the relationship between involvement and problem gambling.

How gambling motives are associated with socio-demographics and gambling behavior - A Finnish population study

“…Some gamblers with the escape motive describe gambling as a dissociative state (Wood & Griffiths, 2007), which can intensify gambling. Thus, problem gambling often manifests in high gambling intensity and versatility, which likely explains our results (Mazar, Zorn, Becker, & Volberg, 2020).…”

Sportwetten: Spielanreize und Risikopotenziale

“…Exemplarisch sei eine Publikation aus Massachusetts (USA) angeführt, wonach der Anteil der Prob-lemspielerInnen bei Kasinospielen (inkl. Automatenspiel), Bingo und Sportwetten am größten ausfällt [17]. Während diese Bezie-Dieses Dokument wurde zum persönlichen Gebrauch heruntergeladen.…”

Skin Gambling Contributes to Gambling Problems and Harm After Controlling for Other Forms of Traditional Gambling

“…Thus, skins used for games of chance may simply be an accessible form of currency for these gamblers and is the source of their gambling-harm. An alternative explanation is that the games of chance used for skin gambling (e.g., roulette, coinflip, slots) are more likely to lead to gambling problems and harm due to their structural characteristics similar to casino table games and EGMs which are known to facilitate persistence, loss chasing and impaired control (Currie et al, 2021;Dowling et al, 2005;Schull, 2012;Mazar et al, 2020;Williams et al, 2021). In contrast, esports betting, whether using cash or skins, is based on discrete events that do not provide the opportunity for continuous gambling.…”