2016
DOI: 10.1007/s40429-016-0112-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gambling Disorder in the DSM-5: Opportunities to Improve Diagnosis and Treatment Especially in Substance Use and Homeless Populations

Abstract: In the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders (DSM-5), gambling disorder (GD) underwent several changes. This paper reviews recent research related to the revisions, including the elimination of the illegal acts criterion and the newly lowered diagnostic threshold. These studies suggest the removal of the illegal acts criterion has little impact in terms of prevalence or loss of diagnostic status among gamblers, especially when considered in combination with the newly lower… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Gambling disorder and its apparent relationship to casino proximity warranted discussion in this literature review. Gambling disorder, previously termed pathological gambling was renamed to gambling disorder and reclassified from an impulse control disorder to the category of "Substance-related and Addictive Disorders" in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-Fifth Edition ([DSM-5], American Psychiatric Association, 2013; Hodgins and Petry, 2016;Rash and Petry, 2016;Stinchfield et al, 2016;Temcheff et al, 2016).…”
Section: Results From the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gambling disorder and its apparent relationship to casino proximity warranted discussion in this literature review. Gambling disorder, previously termed pathological gambling was renamed to gambling disorder and reclassified from an impulse control disorder to the category of "Substance-related and Addictive Disorders" in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-Fifth Edition ([DSM-5], American Psychiatric Association, 2013; Hodgins and Petry, 2016;Rash and Petry, 2016;Stinchfield et al, 2016;Temcheff et al, 2016).…”
Section: Results From the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far, most of the utilized screening instruments relied on dated editions of DSM and it remains to be seen how the criteria of DSM-5 impact prevalence estimates. It has been argued that increased rates are to be expected particularly in high-risk populations like the homeless (Rash & Petry, 2016). Future researchers should focus on GD as a preferred outcome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is in line with the opinion of some authors who consider the illegal acts criterion to be essential for clinical practice (Mitzner et al, 2011). They suggest that the underreporting of criminal behaviors in a clinical assessment, possibly associated to the social desirability bias, may partially explain the low prevalence rates of this criterion, which was one of the motives for eliminating this criterion in the DSM-5 (Rash and Petry, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%