1990
DOI: 10.1016/0013-4686(90)80035-m
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Galvani potential scales for water—nitrobenzene and water-1,2-dichloroethane interfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
151
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 183 publications
(164 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
13
151
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, they can be [14,15] Shake flask experiments: [CoA C H T U N G T R E N N U N G (tpp)] catalyzed O 2 reductions by Fc, DFc and DMFc at a water j DCE interface at which the polarization was chemically controlled by a common ion, so called shake flask experiments, were performed as reported previously. [28] Dissolving lithium tetrakis(pentafluorophenyl)borate (LiTPFB, 5 mm) and HCl (10 mm) in water and BTPPATPFB (5 mm) in DCE (water/ DCE = 1:1 in volume), the Galvani potential difference across the interface is fixed by the common ion TPFB À at a potential greater than 0.59 V. [28,32] At this potential, proton initially present in water will partition into DCE, leading finally to a distribution of proton in two phases according to the Nernst equation. If only [CoA C H T U N G T R E N N U N G (tpp)] is present in DCE, a Soret band (l max = 427 nm) and a Q band (l max = 540 nm) are observed after the shake flask experiment, which demonstrates a bathochromic shift relative to those of a fresh [Co-A C H T U N G T R E N N U N G (tpp)] solution at 410 nm and 526 nm, as shown in Figure 3.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, they can be [14,15] Shake flask experiments: [CoA C H T U N G T R E N N U N G (tpp)] catalyzed O 2 reductions by Fc, DFc and DMFc at a water j DCE interface at which the polarization was chemically controlled by a common ion, so called shake flask experiments, were performed as reported previously. [28] Dissolving lithium tetrakis(pentafluorophenyl)borate (LiTPFB, 5 mm) and HCl (10 mm) in water and BTPPATPFB (5 mm) in DCE (water/ DCE = 1:1 in volume), the Galvani potential difference across the interface is fixed by the common ion TPFB À at a potential greater than 0.59 V. [28,32] At this potential, proton initially present in water will partition into DCE, leading finally to a distribution of proton in two phases according to the Nernst equation. If only [CoA C H T U N G T R E N N U N G (tpp)] is present in DCE, a Soret band (l max = 427 nm) and a Q band (l max = 540 nm) are observed after the shake flask experiment, which demonstrates a bathochromic shift relative to those of a fresh [Co-A C H T U N G T R E N N U N G (tpp)] solution at 410 nm and 526 nm, as shown in Figure 3.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6. This observation led them to conclude that the ion must overcome Samec et al 53,54 published two papers on the kinetics of ion transfer across the water-nitrobenzene interface, using ac impedance measurements at the equilibrium potentials. The latter were determined by the Nemst equation for ionic equilibria, where the concentration ratio of the crossing ion in both phases was varied:…”
Section: Rt(o In Kf)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under such conditions, the water/ DCE interface is polarized positively, [18] and TB À acts as a pump to drive H + from the aqueous phase to the DCE phase, forming the organic acid HTB. Evidence of the enhancement in rate of the oxidation of the electron donors by GO is clearly seen by comparing the UV/Vis spectra of the organic products [either decamethylferrocenium (DMFc + ) or Fc + ions, pre-and post-shake-flask, with and without GO present] and noting the increased production of the biphasic reaction (l max = 779 and 620 nm, respectively) in the presence of GO (see Figure SI-4.1 in the Supporting Information).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%