2016
DOI: 10.18203/2349-2902.isj20161131
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gall bladder perforation - is it still a diagnostic dilemma: a retrospective study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Out of 7 female cases, 5 were in the age group 61-65 years. This observation was slightly different from a study conducted by Nandyala VN et al 4 In their study, the commonest age group being affected was between 48-60 years with females being more affected within 38-48 years of age. A contradictory finding was seen in the study conducted by Derici H et al, were males were affected more than females with GBP.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 94%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Out of 7 female cases, 5 were in the age group 61-65 years. This observation was slightly different from a study conducted by Nandyala VN et al 4 In their study, the commonest age group being affected was between 48-60 years with females being more affected within 38-48 years of age. A contradictory finding was seen in the study conducted by Derici H et al, were males were affected more than females with GBP.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 94%
“…This is in agreement with various other similar studies. 4,6,7 The incidence of type II and type I GBP was found to be 58.3% and 41.6% respectively. Author did not come across any type III GBP during the study period.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The incidence of gallbladder perforation in acute cholecystitis has been reported to range from 2 to 18%, and in between calculus and acalculous cholecystitis, the overall incidence of gallbladder perforation due to acalculous cholecystitis is higher (Fig. 1), reaching approximately 10 to 20% [5]. It is a rare but life-threatening event with mortality rates reaching 15% [6].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%