2014
DOI: 10.1590/1678-476620141043341346
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Galictis cuja (Mammalia): an update of current knowledge and geographic distribution

Abstract: ABSTRACT. The lesser grison (Galictis cuja) is one of the least-known mustelids in the Neotropics, despite its broad range across South America. This study aimed to explore current knowledge of the distribution of the species to identify gaps in knowledge and anticipate its full geographic distribution. Eighty-nine articles have mentioned G. cuja since 1969, but only 13 focused on the species. We generated a detailed model of the species' potential distribution that validated previous maps, but with improved d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Several recent contributions showed important impacts of selection of M extent on the model output, thus showing that results of ecological niche models are scale dependent 34,37 . Some methods for a delimitation of model calibration areas M include consideration of biomes where the species occur 23 , dispersal estimates from the invasion process [38][39][40] , dispersal potential in the native range based on occurrences 41 , and areas defined arbitrarily for exploratory analyses of poorly known-species 42 . Thus, selection of the M hypothesis should be supported by the data or biogeographic literature on the species, instead of using administrative boundaries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several recent contributions showed important impacts of selection of M extent on the model output, thus showing that results of ecological niche models are scale dependent 34,37 . Some methods for a delimitation of model calibration areas M include consideration of biomes where the species occur 23 , dispersal estimates from the invasion process [38][39][40] , dispersal potential in the native range based on occurrences 41 , and areas defined arbitrarily for exploratory analyses of poorly known-species 42 . Thus, selection of the M hypothesis should be supported by the data or biogeographic literature on the species, instead of using administrative boundaries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those species never occurs in sympatry; G. cuja are more frequently found in drier and open areas from the southern to central South America, while G. vittata inhabits humid evergreen forests from northern South America to Central America. Thus, they are good bioindicators for Brazil (Bornholdt 2012;Muñoz et al 2014;Tarifa 2003a, 2003b). Assuming that the environmental requirements of each of Galictis species today were the same of the past, thus the surrounding past environment of the fossiliferous localities, where each of the species are record, should have similar currently environmental conditions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, for each species, SDMs with the selected parametrization were used to implement spatial projections of environmental suitability (using all occurrence data) along the geographical area inside an estimated accessible area. Following other authors [51], we hypothesized that the accessible area for one species is that within the minimum convex polygon described by its occurrence points in the geographical area plus a buffer equal to the mean distance between each occurrence point and the centroid of the set of points. Finally, SDMs' projections were converted in binary maps (0=non-habitat; 1=suitable habitat) using species specific threshold based on omission error [45].…”
Section: Models Of Species Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%