2019
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz2506
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GALEX absolute calibration and extinction coefficients based on white dwarfs

Abstract: We use 1837 DA white dwarfs with high signal to noise ratio spectra and Gaia parallaxes to verify the absolute calibration and extinction coefficients for the Galaxy Evolution Explorer (GALEX). We use white dwarfs within 100 pc to verify the linearity correction to the GALEX data. We find that the linearity correction is valid for magnitudes brighter than 15.95 and 16.95 for the Far Ultraviolet (FUV) and Near Ultraviolet (NUV) bands, respectively. We also use DA white dwarfs beyond 250 pc to calculate extincti… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…DA white dwarfs are useful spectrophotometric calibrators because their spectra are more or less blackbodies imprinted with broad, deep hydrogen Balmer absorption, making their spectra comparatively easy to model accurately and robustly. It is typically their modeled spectra-not their observed spectrathat are used as the spectrophotometric standards (Holberg 2007;Betoule et al 2013;Axelrod & Miller 2014;Camarota & Holberg 2014;Narayan et al 2016;Calamida et al 2019;López-Sanjuan et al 2019;Narayan et al 2019;Wall et al 2019;Gentile Fusillo et al 2020). For our DA sample, modeling was performed using the DA white dwarf models described in Tremblay et al (2011Tremblay et al ( , 2013.…”
Section: Appendix C Absolute Calibrationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DA white dwarfs are useful spectrophotometric calibrators because their spectra are more or less blackbodies imprinted with broad, deep hydrogen Balmer absorption, making their spectra comparatively easy to model accurately and robustly. It is typically their modeled spectra-not their observed spectrathat are used as the spectrophotometric standards (Holberg 2007;Betoule et al 2013;Axelrod & Miller 2014;Camarota & Holberg 2014;Narayan et al 2016;Calamida et al 2019;López-Sanjuan et al 2019;Narayan et al 2019;Wall et al 2019;Gentile Fusillo et al 2020). For our DA sample, modeling was performed using the DA white dwarf models described in Tremblay et al (2011Tremblay et al ( , 2013.…”
Section: Appendix C Absolute Calibrationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While we were able to achieve an adequate fit to these photometry, we found the resulting model (T eff = 12,400 K) proved inconsistent with the Balmer lines in our optical spectroscopy. Suspecting poor absolute calibration of the Galex fluxes 37 , we acquired NUV SWIFT photometry in December 2018. These observations were performed with the U, UVW1, and UVW2 filters using the UVOT (Ultraviolet/Optical Telescope) instrument.…”
Section: Spectroscopic Observations and Reductionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We estimate the SFR using the FUV magnitude (20.62 mag AB) from the GALEX catalog. The magnitude is corrected for dust extinction assuming R 𝐹𝑈 𝑉 = 8.01 (Wall et al 2019) and E(B-V)=0.09 in the direction of UGC 12591 obtained from IPAC dust maps. The corrected FUV magnitude of UGC 12591 thus estimates is (19.85 mag AB) corresponding to F 𝜆 =5.42 × 10 −16 ergs s −1 cm −2 Å −1 (F 𝜈 = 4.22 × 10 −28 ergs s −1 cm −2 Hz −1 ) and luminosity L FUV =4.66 × 10 26 ergs s −1 Hz −1 .…”
Section: Fuv Derived Star Formation Ratementioning
confidence: 99%