1995
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/273.2.257
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Galaxy number counts - III. Deep CCD observations to B=27.5 mag

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

24
129
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 135 publications
(153 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
24
129
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are large field-to-field variations in the random-field K s -band counts, and even though the counts in the quasar fields appear to lie above the literature averages at fainter K s magnitudes, they are still consistent with the counts from the surveys by, e.g., Soifer et al (1994), Moustakas et al (1997), and Maihara et al (2001). We also find that the R-band number counts are consistent with the counts in the general field (Metcalfe et al 1995;Hogg et al 1997). Overplotted in Figure 5 are also the number counts of EROs in our fields, demonstrating, as expected, that non-ERO galaxies clearly dominate at all magnitudes.…”
Section: K S -Band Countssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…There are large field-to-field variations in the random-field K s -band counts, and even though the counts in the quasar fields appear to lie above the literature averages at fainter K s magnitudes, they are still consistent with the counts from the surveys by, e.g., Soifer et al (1994), Moustakas et al (1997), and Maihara et al (2001). We also find that the R-band number counts are consistent with the counts in the general field (Metcalfe et al 1995;Hogg et al 1997). Overplotted in Figure 5 are also the number counts of EROs in our fields, demonstrating, as expected, that non-ERO galaxies clearly dominate at all magnitudes.…”
Section: K S -Band Countssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…SpeciÐcally, we have multiplied GFÏs S0 counts by 73/57 and, in order to preserve the total counts, we have taken the di †erential counts from both the E and Sp populations according to the relative percentages given in°3 (75% and 25%, respectively). (iii) The Ðeld contamination was determined from the galaxy number counts given by Metcalfe et al (1995) and the breakdown into morphological classes (E : S0 : Sp \ 18 : 27 : 56) was computed for our limiting magnitudes at z D 0.2 from the Ðts to the di †erential number counts of the Medium Deep Survey (S97). The background assumed is listed for each cluster in Table 5, which is available the on-line edition of the Journal.…”
Section: Evolution In Morphological Contentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e-mail: swagner@lsw.uni-heidelberg.de incorporating luminosity evolution have been found to explain the number counts down to the faintest levels (Metcalfe et al 1995;Pozzetti et al 1996). As pointed out by Gardner (1998) however, the colour distribution contains more information about the state of evolution than the pure number counts, and the modeling of the colour distributions is a good test for the evolution models which explain number counts in individual filters.…”
Section: Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 and 4 we compare counts of galaxies at the NEP with published counts from other surveys in B j and R, respectively. The reference data are from Bertin & Dennefeld (1997), Jones et al (1991), Huang et al (2001) and Metcalfe et al (1991Metcalfe et al ( , 1995. All B j -counts except Huang et al (2001) were either performed in a B j -filter or transformed to B j using equations given by the authors.…”
Section: Number Densities Of Galaxiesmentioning
confidence: 99%