2002
DOI: 10.1086/339305
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Galaxy Morphology in the Rich Cluster Abell 2390

Abstract: We have analysed images of the field of A2390 obtained with the CFHT and HST. The analysis fits models to bulge and disk components to several hundred galaxies, with about equal samples from the cluster and field. We also have assessed and graded asymmetries in the images. The cluster galaxies are compared in different cluster locations and also compared with field galaxies. We find that the central old population galaxies are bulge-dominated, while disk systems have young populations and are found predominant… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, necessarily shallow HST imaging data will not detect or measure structures beyond the spheroidal population (see Fig 3). We also find (Hutchings et al 2001) from comparing intermediate-redshift galaxy clusters and field galaxies, that galaxies in an interaction-rich environment have brighter bulges and fainter disks as a result.…”
Section: Caveats To Host Galaxy Folklorementioning
confidence: 58%
“…Thus, necessarily shallow HST imaging data will not detect or measure structures beyond the spheroidal population (see Fig 3). We also find (Hutchings et al 2001) from comparing intermediate-redshift galaxy clusters and field galaxies, that galaxies in an interaction-rich environment have brighter bulges and fainter disks as a result.…”
Section: Caveats To Host Galaxy Folklorementioning
confidence: 58%
“…By comparing spectral features to quantitative measures of galaxy morphology from our extensive sample of CL 1358+62 (z = 0.3283; Fisher et al 1998, hereafter F98), we can address this issue as well as test for correlations between morphology and cluster substructure (e.g. Hutchings et al 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%