2020
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201936243
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Galaxy kinematics across different environments in the RXJ1347−1145 cluster complex

Abstract: Aims. In order to understand the role of the different processes that drive galaxy evolution in clusters, we need comprehensive studies that simultaneously examine several of the most important physical properties of galaxies. In this work we study the interplay between the kinematic state and star formation activity of galaxies in the RXJ1347-1145 cluster complex at z∼0.45. Methods. We used VLT/VIMOS to obtain slit spectra for 95 galaxies across the 40 x40 area where the RXJ1347-1145 cluster complex resides. … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
(127 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have studied the redshift evolution of the TFR, the VSR, and sAMR in clusters up to z ∼ 1.5. We used a collection of clusters at different redshifts for this purpose, many of which were the single focus of previous publications: Abell 901/902 at z ∼ 0.16 (Bösch et al 2013a,b), RXJ1347 at z ∼ 0.45 (Pérez-Martínez et al 2020), XMM2235 at z ∼ 1.4 (Pérez-Martínez et al 2017), and two HSC (proto-)clusters at z ∼ 1.5 (Böhm et al 2020). Furthermore, we presented the first results from a sample of galaxies in the CL1604 cluster system at z ∼ 0.9 observed with GTC/OSIRIS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We have studied the redshift evolution of the TFR, the VSR, and sAMR in clusters up to z ∼ 1.5. We used a collection of clusters at different redshifts for this purpose, many of which were the single focus of previous publications: Abell 901/902 at z ∼ 0.16 (Bösch et al 2013a,b), RXJ1347 at z ∼ 0.45 (Pérez-Martínez et al 2020), XMM2235 at z ∼ 1.4 (Pérez-Martínez et al 2017), and two HSC (proto-)clusters at z ∼ 1.5 (Böhm et al 2020). Furthermore, we presented the first results from a sample of galaxies in the CL1604 cluster system at z ∼ 0.9 observed with GTC/OSIRIS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our previous analysis of HST/ACS images of disk galaxies reported systematical errors of 20% in galaxy sizes (Böhm et al 2013;Pérez-Martínez et al 2020). We also adopted this error value for our work below.…”
Section: Structural Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The presence of shocked gas around two very bright galaxies close to the cluster core suggests that RXJ1347 is undergoing a major merger (Verdugo et al 2012). Our group investigated the internal gas kinematics and star formation activity of a sample of 50 star-forming galaxies in RXJ1347 (Pérez-Martínez et al 2020). Most of these objects form part of a previous medium-resolution spectroscopic campaign carried out by our group which allowed us to confirm their cluster membership and star-forming nature.…”
Section: Rxj1347 At Z∼045mentioning
confidence: 99%

The evolution of galaxy scaling relations in clusters at 0.5

Pérez-Martínez,
Ziegler,
Dannerbauer
et al. 2020
Preprint
Self Cite
“…Moreover, to understand how galaxies transform inside the clusters presents one of the main steps in disentangling the picture of galaxy formation and evolution, and the formation and evolution of the universe at large. Some of previous works observed differences between the properties of galaxies in the field and those in clusters (e.g., Dressler, Thompson & Shectman 1985;Balogh et al 1997;Koopmann & Kenney 1998;Cucciati et al 2010;Chung et al 2011;Hwang et al 2012;Delaye et al 2014;Cantale et al 2016;Allen et al 2016;Maier et al 2016;Saracco et al 2017;Matharu et al 2020;Old et al 2020;Pérez-Martínez et al 2020;Tiley et al 2020), although the difference seems to be more significant for star-forming than for quiescent galaxies (e.g., Allen et al 2016;Saracco et al 2017;Old et al 2020;Tiley et al 2020). Specifically, the star formation activity seems to be anti-correlated with the local density (Haines et al 2013;Kovač et al 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%