2016
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stw2955
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Galaxy gas as obscurer – II. Separating the galaxy-scale and nuclear obscurers of active galactic nuclei

Abstract: The "torus" obscurer of Active Galactic Nuclei (AGN) is poorly understood in terms of its density, substructure and physical mechanisms. Large X-ray surveys provide model boundary constraints, for both Compton-thin and Compton-thick levels of obscuration, as obscured fractions are mean covering factors f cov . However, a major remaining uncertainty is host galaxy obscuration. In Paper I we discovered a relation of N H ∝ M 1/3 for the obscuration of galaxy-scale gas. Here we apply this observational relation to… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
55
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 115 publications
6
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More detailed analysis and complex modelling of high signal-to-noise X-ray spectra where available, in comparison with studies in the literature (e.g. Buchner & Bauer 2017), will aid in separating galacticscale from nuclear-scale absorption contributions. We have also presented the results of a pilot study conducted with the commissioning telescope BETA, as part of preparations for FLASH science with ASKAP.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More detailed analysis and complex modelling of high signal-to-noise X-ray spectra where available, in comparison with studies in the literature (e.g. Buchner & Bauer 2017), will aid in separating galacticscale from nuclear-scale absorption contributions. We have also presented the results of a pilot study conducted with the commissioning telescope BETA, as part of preparations for FLASH science with ASKAP.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the difference is only weakly significant, a similar result has also been reported for CT AGNs selected with SwiftBAT (Koss et al 2016a). Other studies, however, find that edge-on galaxy inclinations are not clearly related to CT absorption (e.g., Annuar et al 2017;Buchner & Bauer 2017). .…”
Section: Host Galaxiesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Generally, the obscuring material is related to the pc-scale dusty torus, which produces the highest N H values, or to the diffuse interstellar medium (ISM) in the host galaxy, which can also create N H as high as 10 22 23.5 -cm −2 (e.g., Simcoe et al 1997;Goulding et al 2012;Buchner & Bauer 2017). It is also found that 100 pc-scale dust filaments, which might be the nuclear fueling channels, could also be responsible for the obscuration (Prieto et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the realistic geometry of the torus and the AGN obscuration from torus-scale to galaxy-scale (Buchner & Bauer 2017), it is unlikely that all the reflected X-ray photons could leave the galaxy without any absorption, as expected by the flat-surface reflection model "pexrav." The X-ray reflection, if separated from the transmitted power-law as a stand-alone component, must be self-absorbed by the torus or obscured by material on a larger scale.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%