2022
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stac759
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Galaxy–galaxy strong lens perturbations: line-of-sight haloes versus lens subhaloes

Abstract: We rederive the number density of intervening line-of-sight haloes relative to lens subhaloes in galaxy-galaxy strong lensing observations, where these perturbers can generate detectable image fluctuations. Previous studies have calculated the detection limit of a line-of-sight small-mass dark halo by comparing the lensing deflection angles it would cause, to those caused by a subhalo within the lens. However, this overly simplifies the difference in observational consequences between a subhalo and a line-of-s… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
(51 reference statements)
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our islands may be smaller than theirs in part because of our threshold of x HI > 0.5 for a cell to be part of an island, which ignores many partially ionized cells, especially in the models with faint sources. Still, the spread between our models is similar to the range found in[80] and larger than that in[81], giving us confidence that our range of scenarios is representative 14. When we fit the stacked absorption spectra following[82], we allow the normalization of the flux to float in the fit, as is done in[40].…”
supporting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our islands may be smaller than theirs in part because of our threshold of x HI > 0.5 for a cell to be part of an island, which ignores many partially ionized cells, especially in the models with faint sources. Still, the spread between our models is similar to the range found in[80] and larger than that in[81], giving us confidence that our range of scenarios is representative 14. When we fit the stacked absorption spectra following[82], we allow the normalization of the flux to float in the fit, as is done in[40].…”
supporting
confidence: 58%
“…The Lyman-α forest flux power spectrum is sensitive to P lin (k) up to wavenumber k ≈ 50 h Mpc −1 , with the most recent measurements placing tight limits on the parameter space of CDM alternatives [5][6][7][8][9][10][11]. 1 Probing P lin (k) on smaller scales, flux ratio measurements in strong gravitational lenses are currently sensitive to perturbations by halos with masses M 2 × 10 7 h −1 M , corresponding to k ≈ 160 h Mpc −1 [12][13][14]. Future observations by the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) aim to extend this sensitivity to M ∼ 2 × 10 6 h −1 M , or k ≈ 340 h Mpc −1 (JWST GO-02046; PI Nierenberg).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This means that the mass contribution of the LOS halos is very small as compared to that of the deflector, at least for this configuration. Other works attempt to determine the effects of LOS halos; see, for example, Hogg et al (2022), He et al (2022).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…would be a smoking gun of the 'clumpy' Cold Dark Matter (CDM) model, they would also perturb the multiple images (Natarajan & Springel 2004;Vegetti et al 2010;Vegetti et al 2014;Li et al 2016Li et al , 2017Hezaveh et al 2016;Ritondale et al 2019;Despali et al 2019;He et al 2021;Amorisco et al 2022;Nightingale et al 2022).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%