1996
DOI: 10.1086/177125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Galaxy Cluster Virial Masses and Omega

Abstract: To re-examine the rich cluster $\Omega$ value the CNOC Cluster Survey has observed 16 high X-ray luminosity clusters in the redshift range 0.17 to 0.55, obtaining approximately 2600 velocities in their fields. Directly adding all the K and evolution corrected $r$ band light to $M_r(0)=-18.5$, about $0.2L_\ast$, and correcting for the light below the limit, the average mass-to-light ratio of the clusters is $283\pm27h\msun/\lsun$ and the average mass per galaxy is $3.5\pm0.4\times10^{12}h^{-1}\msun$. The cluste… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

66
557
6
2

Year Published

1997
1997
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 504 publications
(634 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
66
557
6
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We are impressed that all recent cluster measurements of , including the traditional M/L anal-Q 0 ysis (Carlberg et al 1996), a PS analysis of velocity dispersions (Carlberg et al 1997), and the baryon fraction (White et al 1993b), yield consistent results. Whether the prediction of the simplest inflation models that the universe is spatially flat will suffer the same fate as the closed model is not yet known.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…We are impressed that all recent cluster measurements of , including the traditional M/L anal-Q 0 ysis (Carlberg et al 1996), a PS analysis of velocity dispersions (Carlberg et al 1997), and the baryon fraction (White et al 1993b), yield consistent results. Whether the prediction of the simplest inflation models that the universe is spatially flat will suffer the same fate as the closed model is not yet known.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Since the cluster velocity dispersion is in agreement with the value of Carlberg et al (1996 a&b), this is also the case for the total mass estimate and the mass to light ratio of the cluster: i) if we consider only the velocity dispersions σ cl ≈ 600km/s and σ dyn = (690 ± 100)km/s derived from lensing and peculiar velocities and ignore the asymmetry for the mass estimate within the virial radius, the lensing mass is 75% of the dynamical mass, but of course compatible to it within the error bars. ii) Including all galaxies considered for the light deflection, we obtain (for a Einstein-de Sitter cosmology) a mass within chip-3 of ≈ 8 * 10 13 h −1 50 Mø, which transfers to a mass of 1 * 10 15 h −1 50 Mø within the virial radius of 1.803h −1 100 Mpc (Carlberg et al 1996b), if the combined mass profile of the cluster and its galaxies is isothermal out to the virial radius. The Carlberg et al (1996a) value is 5.5 * 10 14 h −1 100 Mø (for Ω = 0.2) and this estimate decreases by about 10 percent if one uses Ω = 1.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Donahue 1996;Mushotzky & Scharf 1997;Henry 1997) and ROSAT (Ebeling et al 1997, Burke et al 1997, Rosati et al 1998) measurements of the X-ray emitting intracluster plasma now complement the low-redshift studies carried out by Edge et al (1990) and David et al (1993). In addition, the CNOC survey provides galaxy velocity dispersions for a well-defined sample of high-redshift clusters (Carlberg et al 1996) and further information on mass distributions is coming from weak gravitational lensing measurements (e.g. Luppino & Kaiser 1997;Smail et al 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%