2014
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stu2340
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Galactic outflow and diffuse gas properties at z ≥ 1 using different baryonic feedback models

Abstract: We measure and quantify properties of galactic outflows and diffuse gas at z 1 in cosmological hydrodynamical simulations performed using the GADGET-3 code containing novel baryonic feedback models. Our sub-resolution model, MUPPI, implements supernova feedback using fully local gas properties, where the wind velocity and mass loading are not given as input. We find the following trends at z = 2 by analysing central galaxies having a stellar mass higher than 10 9 M ⊙ . The outflow velocity and mass outflow rat… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
48
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 126 publications
5
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The different lines in Figure 10 represent various theoretical (Okamoto et al 2010;Davé et al 2011;Hopkins et al 2012;Puchwein & Springel 2013;Barai et al 2015;Muratov et al 2015) and empirical models (Peeples & Shankar 2011;Zahid et al 2014). 10 In comparing observations and models, it is important to bear in mind that some are fiducial scaling relations put in the sub-grid physics (e.g., Davé et al 2011;Puchwein & Springel 2013;, while others are from more complex numerical approaches (e.g., Hopkins et al 2012Hopkins et al , 2013Barai et al 2015;Muratov et al 2015) 11 and thus are more directly comparable with observations.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The different lines in Figure 10 represent various theoretical (Okamoto et al 2010;Davé et al 2011;Hopkins et al 2012;Puchwein & Springel 2013;Barai et al 2015;Muratov et al 2015) and empirical models (Peeples & Shankar 2011;Zahid et al 2014). 10 In comparing observations and models, it is important to bear in mind that some are fiducial scaling relations put in the sub-grid physics (e.g., Davé et al 2011;Puchwein & Springel 2013;, while others are from more complex numerical approaches (e.g., Hopkins et al 2012Hopkins et al , 2013Barai et al 2015;Muratov et al 2015) 11 and thus are more directly comparable with observations.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…We adopt a constant-velocity outflow with vSN = 350 km/s (as was done in e.g. Barai et al 2015;Biffi et al 2016). Stellar evolution and chemical enrichment are computed for the 11 elements (following Tornatore et al 2007).…”
Section: Model)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative way to implement the collective effect of SN explosions is the (stochastic) implementation of thermal feedback, where galactic winds develop without imposing any input outflow velocity or mass loading factor such as in the EAGLE simulations (e.g., Schaye et al 2015), the FIRE simulations (Hopkins et al 2014;Muratov et al 2015), and the multi-phase scheme of Barai et al (2015).…”
Section: Cmentioning
confidence: 99%