1996
DOI: 10.1086/177472
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Galactic Evolution of D and 3He Including Stellar Production of 3He

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
53
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
4
53
1
Order By: Relevance
“…density of 8 M pc À2 (Matteucci & François 1989), X ¼ 0:4 corresponds to an excess infall rate of 0:0006 M kpc À2 yr À1 . This value is below and thus compatible with the previously calculated total infall rates of 0:002 0:004 M kpc À2 yr À1 (see Dearborn et al 1996).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…density of 8 M pc À2 (Matteucci & François 1989), X ¼ 0:4 corresponds to an excess infall rate of 0:0006 M kpc À2 yr À1 . This value is below and thus compatible with the previously calculated total infall rates of 0:002 0:004 M kpc À2 yr À1 (see Dearborn et al 1996).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The change with time for 3 He is more complex. In the early part of galactic evolution, destruction of 3 He in massive stars will be counteracted by production from D burning, resulting in a relatively flat 3 He evolution curve (Dearborn, Steigman, & Tosi 1996). It is only after several gigayears in the life of a galaxy that 3 He production from incomplete hydrogen burning could become significant when the lowmass stars start to die.…”
Section: Observations and Measurement Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Standard stellar theory for low-mass stars (see, e.g., Iben & Truran 1978) predicts a significant amount of production in these stars. When incorporated into simple models of Galactic chemical evolution, one would expect 3 He abundances in great excess from those observed (Vangioni-Flam, Olive, & Prantzos 1994;Olive et al 1995;Galli et al 1995;Scully et al 1996Scully et al , 1997Dearborn, Steigman, & Tosi 1996). While it is quite possible that additional 3 He destruction mechanisms (Charbonnel 1994(Charbonnel , 1995(Charbonnel , 1996Hogan 1995;Wasserburg, Boothroyd, & Sackmann 1995) can lead to a consistent picture for the evolution of 3 He Galli et al 1997), one must argue that the new process is not operative in all stars in order to avoid a contradiction between a few planetary nebulae showing high 3 He abundances (from 2 to 10 Â 10 À4 : Balser et al 1997; and H ii regions with small 3 He content (about 2 Â 10 À5 ; .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to standard stellar models, 3 He is most efficiently produced on the main sequence (MS) of 1-2 M stars through the action of the p-p chains. In order not to overproduce 3 He in the course of Galactic evolution, it has become customary to assume that some unknown 3 He-destruction mechanism is at work in more than 90% of low-mass stars (Dearborn et al 1996, Galli et al 1997, Chiappini et al 2002, Romano et al 2003. Hogan (1995) and Charbonnel (1995) have suggested 'extra mixing' during the red giant branch (RGB) phase of low-mass stars as a possible solution (see also Charbonnel & Do Nascimento 1998, Sackmann & Boothroyd 1999.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%