2018
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty2135
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Galactic binaries can explain the Fermi Galactic centre excess and 511 keV emission

Abstract: The Fermi -LAT Galactic Center excess and the 511 keV positron-annihilation signal from the inner Galaxy bare a striking morphological similarity. We propose that both can be explained through a scenario in which millisecond pulsars produce the Galactic Center excess and their progenitors, low-mass X-ray binaries, the 511 keV signal. As a proof-of-principle we study a specific population synthesis scenario from the literature involving so-called ultracompact X-ray binaries. Moreover, for the first time, we qua… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 152 publications
(260 reference statements)
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is the most conservative option; if we had assumed the contribution of some astrophysical source(s) to this gamma-ray observation, then the upper limit on the positron injection luminosity would have been much lower. The flux of this line in the bulge and the central source of our Galaxy is (0.96 ± 0.07) × 10 −3 photons cm −2 s −1 and (0.08 ± 0.02) × 10 −3 photons cm −2 s −1 respectively [61]. Thus, our limits can be improved by more than an order of magnitude if one identifies the class(es) of astrophysical source(s) which is contributing to this emission in the Galactic bulge.…”
Section: Formalismmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is the most conservative option; if we had assumed the contribution of some astrophysical source(s) to this gamma-ray observation, then the upper limit on the positron injection luminosity would have been much lower. The flux of this line in the bulge and the central source of our Galaxy is (0.96 ± 0.07) × 10 −3 photons cm −2 s −1 and (0.08 ± 0.02) × 10 −3 photons cm −2 s −1 respectively [61]. Thus, our limits can be improved by more than an order of magnitude if one identifies the class(es) of astrophysical source(s) which is contributing to this emission in the Galactic bulge.…”
Section: Formalismmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Despite the intense scrutiny of this signal, we do not yet know the origin of this signal. Many viable astrophysical models (i.e., models which do not require a dark matter origin of the 511 keV signal) have been proposed [19,[57][58][59][60][61][62], although none are confirmed to be the source of these low energy positrons. A detailed morphological study of this signal and its absence in the dwarf galaxies [63] indicate that this it is not produced via dark matter interactions [64].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If positron annihilation is occuring in an environment where relativistic electrons are present (e.g. in a microquasar jet [13,14] or pulsars and millisecond pulsars, [15]) it may be possible to circumvent this constraint. However, the presence of the 511 keV line and ortho-positronium continuum at low gamma-ray energies strongly suggest that the majority of positrons annihilate via interactions with neutral hydrogen at thermal energies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nuclear stellar cluster as well as a large number of the Milky Way's globular clusters would stand out of the otherwise diffuse glow and provide direct evidence for these types of scenarios. With arcmin resolution, it would furthermore be possible to distinguish among mildly relativistic, quiescent XRB outflows [7] or stellar flares as the latter would directly follow the globular cluster's radial profile.…”
Section: Candidate Sources -Detecting Sources In Flagrantimentioning
confidence: 99%