2020
DOI: 10.1109/tnsre.2019.2950309
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gait Trajectory and Event Prediction from State Estimation for Exoskeletons During Gait

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
29
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A lesser known but similar approach is based on probabilistic Principal Component Analysis and has been proposed by Aertebeliën and De Schutter [3]. It is used by Tanghe et al to model gait [11] and by Vergara et al in the control of a robotic arm [1]. Other probabilistic approaches use Gaussian Mixture Models (GMM) to recognize reaching motions [12].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A lesser known but similar approach is based on probabilistic Principal Component Analysis and has been proposed by Aertebeliën and De Schutter [3]. It is used by Tanghe et al to model gait [11] and by Vergara et al in the control of a robotic arm [1]. Other probabilistic approaches use Gaussian Mixture Models (GMM) to recognize reaching motions [12].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the performance of the IEKF was compared with the Moving Horizon Estimation (MHE) proposed in [11], with a horizon containing 10 observations. Comparison was done based on the average cumulative euclidean distance between estimated phase speed curves (such as shown in figure 3a) and benchmark curves.…”
Section: B Evaluation Of Phase Speed Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The predicted kinematic feature variables, LA and AV, for the shank and thigh were reliably predicted up to 10 samples or time steps, i.e., up to 60 ms in the future. A 60-ms prediction of future trajectories adds a feedforward term to an assistive device controller rather than being reactive and predominantly relying on feedback terms (i.e., sensory information; Tanghe et al, 2019). This enables the assistive device to adapt to changes in human gait, allowing smoother synchronisation with user intentions and minimising interruptions when the user changes their movement pattern (Elliott et al, 2014;Zhang et al, 2017;Ding et al, 2018;Zaroug et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another technique was implemented in the Lower Extremity Powered Exoskeleton (LOPES) device to emulate the trajectories from a healthy limb to the impaired limb (Vallery et al, 2008). Prediction of the lower limb joint angles future trajectory that effectively leads to foot events timing was also investigated in the works of Aertbeliën and De Schutter (2014) and Tanghe et al (2019) using probabilistic principal component analysis (PPCA).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies describe methods to identify locomotion modes and transitions among them based on integrating EMG signals with ground reaction forces [21], accelerometers [22], [23], and both accelerometers and gyroscopes [24]. Tanghe et al [25] fused different types of mechanical sensors to predict gait events and joint trajectories through a probabilistic principle component model. Results from these studies indicate that sensor fusion methods can increase the accuracy and robustness of a myoelectrical control system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%