2017
DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2017-098637
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gait retraining: out of the lab and onto the streets with the benefit of wearables

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, they may not reflect a runner's actual gait pattern while running in their usual environment [20]. Wearable sensors represent a potential low-cost solution to collect in-field data [21]. Accurate wearables could be used to monitor the ability and compliance of runners when gait modifications are recommended to reduce injury risk, return to running after an injury or improve performance [22].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, they may not reflect a runner's actual gait pattern while running in their usual environment [20]. Wearable sensors represent a potential low-cost solution to collect in-field data [21]. Accurate wearables could be used to monitor the ability and compliance of runners when gait modifications are recommended to reduce injury risk, return to running after an injury or improve performance [22].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It could even be argued that individual practice between retraining sessions with clinician feedback—like we used in our study—would be justified to enhance transfer compared with discharging runners without further feedback after eight sessions of treadmill retraining. However, this remains purely hypothetical until studies use wearable devices to assess the retention of gait modifications during community runs 7. While we cannot ascertain—similar to previous studies—that the newly acquired gait modifications were reproduced out of the lab, participants in our study effectively reduced vertical and patellofemoral joint loading rates after the intervention.…”
Section: Retraining Schedulementioning
confidence: 63%
“…Flexible textile strain sensors provide a convenient approach to measuring biomechanical changes resulting from fatigue. Gold standard methods, including force plate analysis or optical motion capture systems, are challenging for running applications because of the restriction of data collection to lab settings [ 51 ]. Other methods that allow for collection outside of the lab, including sEMG, can be plagued with poor signal quality from the difficulty of maintaining appropriate contact with the skin during prolonged vigorous movements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%