2021
DOI: 10.1097/mrr.0000000000000498
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gait parameters assessed with inertial measurement unit during 6-minute walk test in people after stroke

Abstract: Gait impairments are among the main issues for stroke survivors as they are often linked with a lack of endurance capacity, balance impairments and functional limitations. These conditions can be carefully assessed by combining an endurance capacity test, the 6-minute walk test (6MWT), with the analysis of gait performed by an inertial measurement unit (IMU). We investigated the evolution of gait spatiotemporal and kinematic parameters during the 6MWT and compared it with age-matched healthy subjects. Moreover… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(50 reference statements)
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, differences were observed in the gait metrics between the affected and less-affected legs, as well as between the 10MWT and 6MWT, with a shorter stance phase, a prolonged swing phase, and a decreased range of motion in the hip, knee, and ankle joints of the affected leg compared with the less-affected leg. During the 6MWT, all joint ranges were larger and step width was shorter when compared with the metrics of the 10MWT, which is in accordance with existing research on different walking speeds [ 4 , 50 ] and distances [ 51 ]. The 6MWT was performed on a 60 m long pathway, which provided reasonable space for accelerating and decelerating walking speed and harmonizing gait patterns in contrast to the 10MWT set up.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Finally, differences were observed in the gait metrics between the affected and less-affected legs, as well as between the 10MWT and 6MWT, with a shorter stance phase, a prolonged swing phase, and a decreased range of motion in the hip, knee, and ankle joints of the affected leg compared with the less-affected leg. During the 6MWT, all joint ranges were larger and step width was shorter when compared with the metrics of the 10MWT, which is in accordance with existing research on different walking speeds [ 4 , 50 ] and distances [ 51 ]. The 6MWT was performed on a 60 m long pathway, which provided reasonable space for accelerating and decelerating walking speed and harmonizing gait patterns in contrast to the 10MWT set up.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The correlation between clinical and sensor-based gait measures of the affected leg followed the expected assumptions for most of the outcomes. An increase in step length showed strong relationships with improved results in the 10MWT, 6MWT, and TUG, as well as moderate associations with MI-LE [ 51 ]. Further, an increase in stance phase duration was negatively associated with the results on the 10MWT, 6MWT, MI-LE, and TUG.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Body-worn IMUs for gait analysis are more than ever used in clinical assessment and clinical studies in several neurological diseases, such as Parkinson's disease, stroke, and multiple sclerosis [65][66][67]. These systems are easy to use, time-and cost-effective, do not require special equipment or expertise, and could be used in different settings.…”
Section: Gait Variabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it may be more accurate to opt for more measurable metrics, such as the amount of pain killer medication consumed, defecation time, which can aid in making comparison across studies, since their methodologies can be verified and replicated more reliably, and placebo effects can be accounted for. Additionally, data obtained from bread and butter physical tests, such as the 6-min walking test (6MWT), can be further enhanced with the use of accessory devices, to provide greater insight into the functional status of the patient ( 98 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%