2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2020.02.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gait changes following direct versus contralateral strength training: A randomized controlled pilot study in individuals with multiple sclerosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Strength training with weights showed similar improvements to the present study. A study investigating direct and contralateral strength training in patients with multiple sclerosis for 6 weeks found 16.5% improvement in walking speed 30 , data very similar to the present study, which found a 17% improvement in walking speed. A recent study showed improvement in the ­walking speed after 24 weeks of strength training combined with cognitive exercises, corroborating the present findings in the 6-minute walk test 31 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Strength training with weights showed similar improvements to the present study. A study investigating direct and contralateral strength training in patients with multiple sclerosis for 6 weeks found 16.5% improvement in walking speed 30 , data very similar to the present study, which found a 17% improvement in walking speed. A recent study showed improvement in the ­walking speed after 24 weeks of strength training combined with cognitive exercises, corroborating the present findings in the 6-minute walk test 31 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Cross-education was deemed suitable to orthopedic conditions and sports injuries, which is consistent with promising data from orthopedic cohorts [41,42], even though other studies have reported no significant value in adding crosseducation to conventional rehabilitative programs [43,44]. Unexpectedly, no consensus was reached in either round (59-67%) regarding the potential use of cross-education for treating neurological patients, despite favorable findings in stroke survivors and people with multiple sclerosis [24][25][26][45][46][47][48][49]. This discrepancy between the results of the consensus and the literature may be partly explained by the lack of familiarity of many respondents with the neurological/neurorehabilitative literature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Blickenstorfer et al [34], using functional magnetic resonance, demonstrated an activation of the contralateral primary motor cortex, premotor cortex, and cerebellum.Although most studies have investigated the phenomenon of cross-education in the area of strength, our research shows a cross-education effect on Tsk. Escamilla-Galindo et al [12] and Manca et al [35] state that the causes of the increase in temperature in the leg that is not exercised are not clear, since other parameters such as phospho-creatinekinase levels or electromyography (EMG), were not measured in their study in parallel with temperature.…”
Section: Cross-educationmentioning
confidence: 99%