2012
DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2012.713736
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gait analysis of amputee people in limiting situations of daily living

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(11 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ranges of change in the inversion/eversion angles were also similar to the observations from non-amputees. However, in another study, it was reported that the inversion/eversion angle changes in prosthetic ankles were much smaller than a non-amputee group on a 6° camber walkway or 10% camber walkway [8, 9]. One reason could be that the camber used in this research is less steep (2.5°) so that the requirement of ankle adaption is reduced.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The ranges of change in the inversion/eversion angles were also similar to the observations from non-amputees. However, in another study, it was reported that the inversion/eversion angle changes in prosthetic ankles were much smaller than a non-amputee group on a 6° camber walkway or 10% camber walkway [8, 9]. One reason could be that the camber used in this research is less steep (2.5°) so that the requirement of ankle adaption is reduced.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Wirta et al first applied camber walking (where the slope is inclined laterally to the walking direction, also known as cross-slope or side-slope) in the assessment of six different types of prosthetic ankle-foot devices and the lack of side to side motion was reported to be a drawback of conventional single axis prosthetic ankle-foot devices [6]. More recently, research on camber walking has been carried out to evaluate a newly developed prosthetic ankle-foot system [7], to investigate the differences between physiological ankles and (unspecified) prosthetic ones [8, 9], and to study the gait strategies of amputees in stability-challenging environments [1012]. It has been found by Villa et al that the (unspecified) prosthetic ankles/feet showed reduced inversion/eversion ankle angle on camber walking compared with non-amputees due to the lack of mobility in the frontal plane [8, 9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation