1999
DOI: 10.1016/s1356-689x(99)80003-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gait analysis in the therapeutic environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
65
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
65
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although clinicians have developed good expertise through many years of practice and training, these observations remain subjective [12]. Principal reason for main, and perhaps sole use of clinician observation as means of gait analysis, is ease of measurement [8,13,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although clinicians have developed good expertise through many years of practice and training, these observations remain subjective [12]. Principal reason for main, and perhaps sole use of clinician observation as means of gait analysis, is ease of measurement [8,13,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…"Interpretation of biomechanical data is complex, time consuming and not readily understood by most therapists" [3].…”
Section: Limiting Factors To Widespread Use Of Biomechanics In Rehabimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although some OGA methods have been shown valid and reliable, it is generally understood that they are specific to patient groups, subjective, and sensitive to the observer's experience (Toro et al, 2003). In 1999, Coutts (Coutts, 1999) argued that despite its limitations, OGA would never be totally replaced as the default GA method in the clinical environment because of ease of use. Current technological advancements, however, should encourage clinicians to re-evaluate instrumented GA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%