2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2019.05.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gait analysis in patients after bilateral versus unilateral total hip arthroplasty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The accuracy of markerless motion tracking depends on three factors: the occlusions between body parts, cameras position/orientation and video resolution; considering the best combination of the considered factors (cameras distance 1.8 m, maximum resolution, and no occlusions due to straight walking) the lowest error in 3D trajectories reconstruction was about 20 mm, the lowest error in swing/stance time was 0.03 s and 1.23 cm in step length. Values are comparable with intra-subject variability in clinical gait analysis investigations (Ciprandi et al, 2017;Temporiti et al, 2019), thus encourage a preliminary adoption of OpenPose-based markerless solutions in this setting. However, it should be noticed that a different configuration (smaller camera distance, lower resolution or diagonal gait direction) can negatively affect the results.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…The accuracy of markerless motion tracking depends on three factors: the occlusions between body parts, cameras position/orientation and video resolution; considering the best combination of the considered factors (cameras distance 1.8 m, maximum resolution, and no occlusions due to straight walking) the lowest error in 3D trajectories reconstruction was about 20 mm, the lowest error in swing/stance time was 0.03 s and 1.23 cm in step length. Values are comparable with intra-subject variability in clinical gait analysis investigations (Ciprandi et al, 2017;Temporiti et al, 2019), thus encourage a preliminary adoption of OpenPose-based markerless solutions in this setting. However, it should be noticed that a different configuration (smaller camera distance, lower resolution or diagonal gait direction) can negatively affect the results.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…A factor that could influence space-time parameters and gait kinematics is pain in walking ability after THA and therefore this could lengthen the LOS in hospital. 48 As for the results obtained under the guidance of the DMAIC through statistical tests and graphic representations, they show how in the total cost of the hospitalization category there is no statistically significant difference between cemented and uncemented, but what most influences the overall costs is the cost of the surgeon and in particular it has a greater influence on the cemented prosthetic approach. Similarly, for the surgical costs category there is no statistically significant difference between the two surgical approaches, but the material cost of surgery for an uncemented prosthesis and the cost of theatre surgery for a cemented prosthesis are the most influential.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Padovan et al (35) examined the effects of a new holistic approach on pain, fear of motion and quality of life in patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty, have evaluated the kinesiophobia with the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia and have found the experimental group's baseline TSK score as 30.6 and the control group as 36.53. Temporiti et al (36) examined the gait analysis after bilateral and unilateral total hip arthroplasty, and found that the TSK score of patients with unilateral arthroplasty was 36.4, and that of patients with bilateral arthroplasty was 34.1. In contrast to this study, the TSK scores of the patients with TKA in our study were higher.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%