2014
DOI: 10.1186/1748-7161-9-s1-o24
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gait analysis in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis walking with Boston brace

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The cadence in the studies by Kaviani et al [37] and Karimi et al [38] did not significantly differ between the Milwaukee orthosis and no orthosis conditions. [37,38] Similarly, no cadence differences were reported between thoracolumbosacral orthosis (TLSO) and no orthosis conditions.…”
Section: Cadencementioning
confidence: 86%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The cadence in the studies by Kaviani et al [37] and Karimi et al [38] did not significantly differ between the Milwaukee orthosis and no orthosis conditions. [37,38] Similarly, no cadence differences were reported between thoracolumbosacral orthosis (TLSO) and no orthosis conditions.…”
Section: Cadencementioning
confidence: 86%
“…[15,[32][33][34][35] Mahaudens et al [30,36] reported the walking speed in km/h, which was not precise enough to be used for characterizing human gait. Kaviani et al [37] and Karimi et al [38] detected a significant decrease in the walking speeds of subjects with AIS (Milwaukee orthosis: 1.4 m/s) versus no orthosis conditions (1.32 m/s). Paolucci et al [39] reported a significant reduction in the walking speed between patients with Cheneau brace (0.57 ± 0.12 m/s) and patients without the brace (0.67 ± 0.13 m/s).…”
Section: Walking Speedmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Researchers also reported that in investigating the motion range of patients with scoliosis and arthritis during walking compared to the patients without arthritis, the trunk motion range of these patients significantly decreased in sagittal, frontal, and horizontal planes [13,[29][30][31].…”
Section: P-valuementioning
confidence: 99%