1998
DOI: 10.1056/nejm199808063390606
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gains in Life Expectancy from Medical Interventions — Standardizing Data on Outcomes

Abstract: A gain in life expectancy from a medical intervention can be categorized as large or small by comparing it with gains from other interventions aimed at the same target population. A gain in life expectancy of a month from a preventive intervention targeted at populations at average risk and a gain of a year from a preventive intervention targeted at populations at elevated risk can both be considered large. The framework we developed for standardizing gains in life expectancy can be used in the interpretation … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
162
1
6

Year Published

1999
1999
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 314 publications
(176 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
7
162
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, we quantify the benefits of annual PSA screening. The results in Table 8 illustrate the benefits are significantly greater than the benefit per person of some well-known population-based prevention programs such as vaccination against measles and rubella, which has an estimated benefit per person of 0.008 QALYs (Wright and Weinstein 1998). Therefore, our results indicate that there is a potentially significant benefit from PSA screening policies based on the risk of prostate cancer relative to other public health interventions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…For instance, we quantify the benefits of annual PSA screening. The results in Table 8 illustrate the benefits are significantly greater than the benefit per person of some well-known population-based prevention programs such as vaccination against measles and rubella, which has an estimated benefit per person of 0.008 QALYs (Wright and Weinstein 1998). Therefore, our results indicate that there is a potentially significant benefit from PSA screening policies based on the risk of prostate cancer relative to other public health interventions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The main purpose of the model is to estimate the likely occurrence of the major diabetes-related complications over a lifetime for patients with specified prognostic risk factors, in order to calculate health outcomes such as life expectancy or quality-adjusted life expectancy. While increases in mean life expectancy are widely recognised as a useful measure of benefit [26], it is also important to encapsulate the potential impact of complications on quality of life. This model uses the quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) method to adjust length of life for quality of life by assigning a value or health utility, on a scale on which 0 represents death and 1 represents full health, for each year of life.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The convention adopted by medical economists is to measure clinical benefits as the number of added life-years (LYs). 4 This measure of benefits is most useful when the primary therapeutic goal is to prolong life expectancy. Because many therapies are used primarily to improve quality of life rather than to increase longevity, a broader measure of benefits is the quality-adjusted life-year (QALY).…”
Section: Analysis Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%