1997
DOI: 10.1108/09684909710163629
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gaining sustainable competitive advantage through strategic pricing: selecting a perceived value price

Abstract: Sustainable competitive advantage is recognized as a critical factor for survival in the turbulent environments of the 1990s. The limited use of pricing as a strategic tool to gain and hold competitive advantage has created an opportunity for companies willing to redesign their competitive portfolios and go with unorthodox strategy mixes. Proposes an approach to value pricing that can be used to seize and drive competitive advantage, and which yields a price that minimizes the risk that buyers will not perceiv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(13 reference statements)
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This supports Chopra and Meindl (2007) and Vachon et al (2009) whom identified quality as essential ingredient in any supplier selection criteria. Besides, it is in line with Thompson and Coe (1997) and Benton and Maloni (2004) argument that competitive prices are essential ingredient in selecting suppliers in the current competitive landscape.…”
supporting
confidence: 62%
“…This supports Chopra and Meindl (2007) and Vachon et al (2009) whom identified quality as essential ingredient in any supplier selection criteria. Besides, it is in line with Thompson and Coe (1997) and Benton and Maloni (2004) argument that competitive prices are essential ingredient in selecting suppliers in the current competitive landscape.…”
supporting
confidence: 62%
“…Variables Literature V1 Tender price Thompson and Coe (1997), Zekiri (2017) V2 Financial performance Wingwon and Piriyakul (2010) V3 Financing capability Grant (1991), Li and Ogunmokun (2001), Piercy, Kaleka, and Katsikeas (1998) V4 Historical contract performance T. Obloj and K. Obloj (2006), Williams, Schnake, and Fredenberger (2005), Goldberg, Cohen, and Fiegenbaum (2003) V5 Social responsibility Du, Bhattacharya, and Sen (2011), Sousa Filho, Wanderley, and Gómez (2010), Zhang, Cavusgil, and Roath (2003) V6 Cultural difference Soupata (2001), Lapersonne (2013) V7 Productivity Helms (1996), Istvan (1992) V8 Internationalization Lehrer, Schlegelmilch, and Behnam (2009), Yeung (1999) V9 Cooperation ability Wu, Lin, and Chien (2011), Alvarez and Barney (2001) V10 Human resources Stroh and Caligiuri (1998), Lado and Wilson (1994) V11 Services Gebauer, Gustafsson, and Witell (2011), Oliva and Kallenberg (2003) V12 Similar performance and experience Fu, Drew, and Lo (2002), Doloi, Iyer, and Sawhney (2011), Holt, Olomolaiye, and Harris (1995) Likert 5-point scale was used to elicit respondents' opinions about the importance of each variable, with 1 being the least important and 5 being the most important. Brief descriptions of some unusual variables were also attached to the questionnaire to ensure that all the respondents were using the same definition for each of the variables.…”
Section: Questionnaire Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pricing objectives can be classified as: profit-oriented objectives, cost-oriented objectives, sales-oriented objectives and competition-oriented objectives (Campo and Gijsbrechts, 2001). The main barrier for low-price strategy has been the belief that industrial markets are inflexible and that price is not a major determinant in influencing demand (Thompson and Coe, 1997). Nowadays many European competitors are facing severe low-prices (usually non-branded competition) that mostly originate from the Far East (Hilleke and Butscher, 1997).…”
Section: Components Of the Product Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%