2002
DOI: 10.1287/msom.4.1.55.285
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gaining Benefits from Joint Forecasting and Replenishment Processes: The Case of Auto-Correlated Demand

Abstract: In this paper we consider a cooperative, two-level supply chain consisting of a retailer and a supplier. As in many practical settings, the supply chain members progressively observe market signals that enable them to explain future demand. The demand itself evolves according to an auto-regressive time series. We examine three types of supply chain configurations. In the first setting, the retailer and the supplier coordinate their policy parameters in an attempt to minimize systemwide costs, but they do not s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
113
1
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 165 publications
(124 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
113
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Commenting on this paper, Raghunathan (2001) argues that the supplier can use the retailer's order history to forecast demands, and then the benefits of sharing demand information disappear. Aviv (2002) develops a similar model, but customer demand evolves according to an auto-regressive time series with market signals, and both a retailer and a supplier have their own signals that are not shared. With this setting, he examines the value of information sharing, VMI and collaborative forecasting.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Commenting on this paper, Raghunathan (2001) argues that the supplier can use the retailer's order history to forecast demands, and then the benefits of sharing demand information disappear. Aviv (2002) develops a similar model, but customer demand evolves according to an auto-regressive time series with market signals, and both a retailer and a supplier have their own signals that are not shared. With this setting, he examines the value of information sharing, VMI and collaborative forecasting.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More information and shorter lead times lead to lower variance. More recent papers consider a variety of mathematical models of collaborative planning and forecasting arrangements: sharing inventory and demand information (Aviv, 2002), vendor managed inventories (Yu et al, 2002), and, by using simulation approach, an examination of the effects of forecasting model selection (Zhao et al, 2002).…”
Section: Demand Uncertainty In the Supply Chain: Collaborative Forecamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, researchers have focused on the benefits of collaborative forecasting (Aviv, 2001(Aviv, , 2002 and its strategic complexity (Miyaoka, 2003;Cachon and Lariviere, 2001;Özer and Wei, 2006;Lariviere, 2002;Terwiesch, Ren, Ho and Cohen, 2004). Aviv (2001) models a collaborative forecasting process among privately-informed supply chain partners, finding that collaborative forecasting may provide substantial benefits for the supply chain, especially when the correlation between trading partners' forecasts is low.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aviv (2001) models a collaborative forecasting process among privately-informed supply chain partners, finding that collaborative forecasting may provide substantial benefits for the supply chain, especially when the correlation between trading partners' forecasts is low. Aviv (2002) extends this model to the case of autocorrelated demand. Both papers assume that forecast accuracy is exogenous and that partners reveal their local demand forecasts truthfully.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%