2015
DOI: 10.1002/rnc.3320
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gain‐scheduled leader‐follower tracking control for interconnected parameter varying systems

Abstract: This paper considers the gain-scheduled leader-follower tracking control problem for a parameter varying complex interconnected system with directed communication topology and uncertain normbounded coupling between the agents. A gain-scheduled consensus-type control protocol is proposed and a sufficient condition is obtained which guarantees a suboptimal bound on the system tracking performance under this protocol. An interpolation technique is used to obtain a protocol schedule which is continuous in the sche… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(94 reference statements)
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reason for recent awareness of nonlinear models is that they describe most physical systems and increase the accuracy and performance of system behavior. During recent decades, various types of adaptive controllers have been developed and applied, more particularly for smaller systems [35][36][37][38][39] and large-scale linear systems [2,5,[32][33][34], based on different approaches, such as, minimum variance [37,39], generalized minimum variance [2,38], decentralization [12], and so on.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason for recent awareness of nonlinear models is that they describe most physical systems and increase the accuracy and performance of system behavior. During recent decades, various types of adaptive controllers have been developed and applied, more particularly for smaller systems [35][36][37][38][39] and large-scale linear systems [2,5,[32][33][34], based on different approaches, such as, minimum variance [37,39], generalized minimum variance [2,38], decentralization [12], and so on.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The synchronisation problem has been recently addressed in [31] for the heterogeneous affine LPV systems, in which all agents are assumed to have access to the exogenous input. A sufficient condition has also been given for solving the gain-scheduled leader-follower tracking control problem [32]. The proposed control law requires the full knowledge of states of each agent and of the leader.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…for any k ∈ . Proof: The number of equations and the number of free variables in linear equation (32)…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis and synthesis results of the work of Hoffmann et al pertain to heterogeneous continuous‐time LFT LPV systems interconnected through switching directed topologies. In addition, consensus problems involving LPV agents were addressed in the works of Seyboth et al and Cheng and Ugrinovskii . The analysis and synthesis results of our paper concern heterogeneous discrete‐time LPV subsystems interconnected over arbitrary directed graphs with a communication latency of one sampling period.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, consensus problems involving LPV agents were addressed in the works of Seyboth et al 28 and Cheng and Ugrinovskii. 29 The analysis and synthesis results of our paper concern heterogeneous discrete-time LPV subsystems interconnected over arbitrary directed graphs with a communication latency of one sampling period. Thus, the distributed LPV systems under consideration are novel.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%