1996
DOI: 10.1063/1.117419
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gain and differential gain of single layer InAs/GaAs quantum dot injection lasers

Abstract: We present gain measurements and calculations for InAs/GaAs quantum dot injection lasers. Measurements of the modal gain and estimation of the confinement factor by transmission electron microscopy yield an exceptionally large material gain of 6.8(±1)×104 cm−1 at 80 A cm−2. Calculations including realistic quantum dot energy levels, dot size fluctuation, nonthermal coupling of carriers in different dots, and band filling effects corroborate this result. A large maximum differential gain of 2×10−12 cm2 at 20 A … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
93
1
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 308 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
93
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…They allow direct electrical pumping and provide high optical gain from a few hundred per cm for bulk semiconductors 21 to > 5×10 4 cm -1 in quantum dot structures 28 . Even higher optical gain, up to many thousands per cm for bulk semiconductors, has been inferred from recent experiments on metallic lasers and nanowire lasers 17,18,20,29,30 .…”
Section: Active Materials For Small Lasersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They allow direct electrical pumping and provide high optical gain from a few hundred per cm for bulk semiconductors 21 to > 5×10 4 cm -1 in quantum dot structures 28 . Even higher optical gain, up to many thousands per cm for bulk semiconductors, has been inferred from recent experiments on metallic lasers and nanowire lasers 17,18,20,29,30 .…”
Section: Active Materials For Small Lasersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For both pure InSb QDs (~1.25 nm) and larger InAs0.6Sb0.4 QDs (~3 nm), the electron-hole wave function overlap lies within the range 35%-40% (using both simulation methods), which is lower than in type I QDs and W-structures [18,19]. However, due to the high QD density, an exceptionally high material gain of ~20 × 10 4 cm −1 can be estimated for our type II QD, which is in the same range as for type I QDs [13]. Despite the smaller electron-hole wave function overlap, these type II QDs can serve as an efficient gain medium for mid-infrared laser diodes.…”
Section: Gain From Insb Qdsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…From Figure 2, the modal gain of the QD laser was estimated to be ~29 cm −1 , (i.e., 2.9 cm −1 per QD layer on average). This value is lower than typical (InAs) type I QDs emitting in the near-infrared range which is in the order of 10 cm −1 [13,14], but is close to that of type II QWs emitting at a similar wavelength [12]. The relatively lower modal gain from type II structures is closely related to the large spatial separation between electrons and holes compared with type I structures, which results in a much smaller electron-hole wave function overlap.…”
Section: Gain From Insb Qdsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Room temperature lasing energy was close to optical transition energy in a wetting layer (WL) [10]. Extremely high material and differential gain have been reported for these lasers, however, poor optical confinement factor led to moderate values of modal gain [14]. Important improvements in threshold characteristics of quantum dot diode lasers became possible due to the use of vertically coupled quantum dots in the active region [15].…”
Section: Threshold Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%