2022
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2206.05864
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gaia Data Release 3: Astrophysical parameters inference system (Apsis) I -- methods and content overview

O. L. Creevey,
R. Sordo,
F. Pailler
et al.

Abstract: Gaia Data Release 3 contains a wealth of new data products for the community. Astrophysical parameters are a major component of this release. They were produced by the Astrophysical parameters inference system (Apsis) within the Gaia Data Processing and Analysis Consortium. The aim of this paper is to describe the overall content of the astrophysical parameters in Gaia DR3 and how they were produced. In Apsis we use the mean BP/RP and mean RVS spectra along with astrometry and photometry, and we derive the fol… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
49
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(44 reference statements)
2
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that the Ca II region slightly changes after the shifting to the heliocentric frame, considering that the radial velocities of most stars lie mainly within ±50 km s −1 , corresponding to |∆λ| 0.14 nm at 866.5 nm. Furthermore, the wings of the Ca II lines are better modeled than their central parts (Creevey et al 2022;Recio-Blanco et al 2022). Thus, our masked region can properly prevent the contamination with the Ca II residuals and consequently the λ864.8 profile can be fitted well.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Note that the Ca II region slightly changes after the shifting to the heliocentric frame, considering that the radial velocities of most stars lie mainly within ±50 km s −1 , corresponding to |∆λ| 0.14 nm at 866.5 nm. Furthermore, the wings of the Ca II lines are better modeled than their central parts (Creevey et al 2022;Recio-Blanco et al 2022). Thus, our masked region can properly prevent the contamination with the Ca II residuals and consequently the λ864.8 profile can be fitted well.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The Gaia-RVS spectra have a wavelength coverage of [846 − 870] nm and a medium resolution of R ∼ 11 500 (Cropper et al 2018). The stellar parameters and chemical abundances, including effective temperature (T eff ), surface gravity (log g), mean metallicity ([M/H]), and individual abundances of up to 13 chemical species, are derived by the General Stellar Parametrizer from spectroscopy (GSP-Spec) module of the Astrophysical parameters inference system (Apsis, Creevey et al 2022;Recio-Blanco et al 2022). We refer to Recio-Blanco et al (2022) for detailed descriptions of the parametrization and a validation of the measurement of λ862 in individual RVS spectra.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the large luminosities of giant stars can hide even potentially massive, non-degenerate companions (El-Badry et al 2022b). We therefore select for only dwarf stars by first removing any stars with a log g < 3.6 (if the stars have a log g measured by Apsis, the Gaia team's astrophysical parameters inference system; Creevey et al 2022;Fouesneau et al 2022) and second making a cut in the color-magnitude diagram:…”
Section: Sample Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the release of Gaia DR3, astrophysical parameters have become available; these are derived from RVS spectra and/or from low-resolution (R ∼ 40) BP/RP prism spectra (Creevey et al 2022). Astrophysical parameters determined from forward-modeling the BP/RP spectra (GSP-Phot, 470 million; Andrae et al 2022) outnumber those obtained from combined RVS spectra of single stars (GSP-Spec, 6 million; Recio-Blanco et al 2022), which come with more precise and detailed information on individual chemical abundances.…”
Section: Gaia Edr3 and Dr3 Datamentioning
confidence: 99%