2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2019.04.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gadolinium-Free Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Stress T1 Mapping in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
6
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3 c). The LV native T1 for the healthy controls were within previously published ranges [ 23 ]. In PAH patients, the native T1 values in the inferior RV wall was comparable to both the LV septal (1303 (1107–1612) vs 1332 (1169–1492)ms, p = 0.71) and LV lateral wall (1303 (1107–1612) vs 1301 (1102–1500)ms, p = 0.85) of PAH patients.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 57%
“…3 c). The LV native T1 for the healthy controls were within previously published ranges [ 23 ]. In PAH patients, the native T1 values in the inferior RV wall was comparable to both the LV septal (1303 (1107–1612) vs 1332 (1169–1492)ms, p = 0.71) and LV lateral wall (1303 (1107–1612) vs 1301 (1102–1500)ms, p = 0.85) of PAH patients.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Shah et al applied stress T1 mapping to a cohort of 20 CKD patients, some of whom also had CAD. 75 Native stress T1 mapping was able to differentiate between remote, ischemic, and infarcted myocardium, with ΔT1 values of 4.7 ± 4.5%, 1.0 ± 4.1%, and −1.1 ± 6.1%, respectively. Notably, these studies did not have invasive reference measures of IMR or FFR for validation.…”
Section: While Both Diabetic Patients and Healthy Controls Demonstratedmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Moreover, the use of gadolinium‐based contrast agents is not desirable in CKD patients, 74 making traditional perfusion MR imaging techniques more challenging. Shah et al applied stress T1 mapping to a cohort of 20 CKD patients, some of whom also had CAD 75 . Native stress T1 mapping was able to differentiate between remote, ischemic, and infarcted myocardium, with ΔT1 values of 4.7 ± 4.5%, 1.0 ± 4.1%, and −1.1 ± 6.1%, respectively.…”
Section: T1 Stress Mapping: Demonstrated Clinical Utility In Cmdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These changes in MBV may be interrogated by stress T1-mapping, based on the principle that native T1 values are sensitive to tissue free water content and may thus detect changes in MBV during vasodilatory stress [ 10 ]. Previous studies have shown that adenosine stress T1-mapping on CMR can distinguish between normal, ischemic, infarcted, and remote myocardium, without the need for gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) [ 9 , [11] , [12] , [13] ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%