With the increasing availability of integrated PET/MR scans the utility and need for MR contrast agents for combined scans is questioned. The purpose of our study was to evaluate if the administration of gadolinium chelates is necessary for evaluation of pediatric tumors on 18F-FDG-PET/MR scans.
Methods
First, we compared the diagnostic accuracy of pre-contrast T2-weighted fast spin echo (FSE), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and T1-weighted MR scans with post-contrast gadolinium chelate enhanced T1-weighted MR scans for the evaluation of 14 diagnostic criteria in 119 pediatric patients with primary and secondary tumors. We next fused 18F-FDG PET scans with either unenhanced T2-weighted MR scans or gadolinium chelate enhanced T1-weighted MR scans in a subset of 36 pediatric patients. We compared the same 14 diagnostic criteria between fused 18F-FDG PET/T2-FSE and fused 18F-FDG PET/Gd-LAVA scans of 123 tumors in this subgroup and evaluated the concordance or discordance of 18F-FDG PET and gadolinium chelate enhancement, using McNemar’s test. Histopathology, surgical notes and follow up imaging served as the standard of reference.
Results
Pre- and post-contrast MR scans did not show significant differences in diagnostic accuracies of 14 diagnostic criteria that evaluated image quality and tumor origin, extent, composition and differential diagnosis. Accordingly, there was no significant difference in diagnostic accuracy of integrated 18F-FDG PET/T2-FSE and 18F-FDG PET/Gd-LAVA scans. The 18F-FDG PET/MR subgroup showed concordant gadolinium chelate enhancement and 18F-FDG avidity in 30 of 36 patients and 106 of 123 tumors.
Conclusion
Gadolinium chelate contrast administration is not necessary for accurate diagnostic characterization of most solid pediatric malignancies on integrated 18F-FDG-PET/MR scans. Exceptions may include focal liver lesions.