Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Signal Processing and Its Applications (Cat.No.01EX467)
DOI: 10.1109/isspa.2001.949801
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gabor's signal expansion and the Gabor transform based on a non-orthogonal sampling geometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We first write the field on the curved line as a sum of modulated and shifted Gaussian window functions and then find the coefficients of each Gaussian elementary signal according to Eq. (26). Afterward, we calculate the samples of the diffraction field on the observation line at z 0.1 m via Eq.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We first write the field on the curved line as a sum of modulated and shifted Gaussian window functions and then find the coefficients of each Gaussian elementary signal according to Eq. (26). Afterward, we calculate the samples of the diffraction field on the observation line at z 0.1 m via Eq.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(22) is extremely redundant. By choosing the discrete set of evaluation points on S and shift steps in frequency properly, we can still decompose the field on S into a discrete set of modulated Gaussian window functions on the tangent planes of S. That is, it is possible to write ux as a sum of Gaussian beams that correspond to Gaussian window functions at discrete positions fr 1 ; r 2 ; …; r n g on S and having discrete modulation frequencies as multiples of F x and F y , as If the discrete evaluation points are taken on a regular grid, then, similar to the planar surface case, an analysis window function w r x r ; y r , which is valid for all r i ∈ fr 1 ; r 2 ; …; r n g, can be found [26]. However, because it is usually not possible to place a regular grid on the entire surface, the surface can be partitioned into small patches and each patch can be treated separately.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Namely, the reference works our study is based upon concern symplectic geometry, 10 metaplectic group, 11 Gabor Frames and their relations to operators 2,3,9,12 and Gabor synthesis on non-separable lattices . 1,16 Note that since Linear Canonical Transformations constitute the subset of Canonical Transformations that model the paraxial optics, the illustrative virtue of this application example has its limitations; in practice it is likely that the some optical elements within the headsets will not suit to paraxial optics, because of the form factor that constraints the spacing between the elements. Also, the rotation of the headset is not a linear transformation, and its paraxial approximation is only relevant when the rotation angle is small.…”
Section: Motivation and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%