2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00138-021-01221-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gabor capsule network with preprocessing blocks for the recognition of complex images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For gastrointestinal illnesses and GI tract disorders, this capsule can generate novel 3D pictures. In [ 20 ], the author proposed a Gabor capsule network for classifying complex images of the Kvasir dataset. The model achieves an overall accuracy of 91.50%.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For gastrointestinal illnesses and GI tract disorders, this capsule can generate novel 3D pictures. In [ 20 ], the author proposed a Gabor capsule network for classifying complex images of the Kvasir dataset. The model achieves an overall accuracy of 91.50%.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In DL, there is always scope for improvement and most of the researchers have not been able to achieve remarkable classification performance. Their methodologies and approaches suffer from various hindering factors because they overlook some inherent hurdles of DL models and medical image datasets [ 15 , 16 , 20 ]. A comparative analysis of state-of-the-art WCE classification models is depicted in Table 1 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By updating the dynamic routing mechanism between the master capsule and the digital capsule, high-level entity representation is obtained, which not only reduces network parameters but also avoids over-fitting. Through the experimental verification of MNIST datasets, compared with CNN, CapsNet has higher classification accuracy in digital recognition, traffic sign recognition, and medical image analysis [ 32 , 33 , 34 ].…”
Section: Proposed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, we compare the test accuracy of our proposed model with the state-of-the-art based CapsNet models (Table 6) on the same datasets, and we analyse the number of training parameters and epochs (Table 7) on the CIFAR-10 dataset. [24] 70.33 --Max-min [25] 75.92 --Fsc-CapsNet [26] 78.73 --Residual CapsNet [27] 75.62 --STAR-Caps [28] 91.23 67.66 -RS-CapsNet [13] 89.81 64.14 96.50 Residual Capsule Network [14] 84.16 --HitNet [29] 73.30 -94.50 Quaternion CapsNet [30] 82.21 -95.37 Multi-lane [31] 76.79 --MS-CapsNet [32] 75.70 --Gabor CapsNet [33] 85.24 68.17 -DenseCaps [8] 89.41 -95.99 DA-CapsNet [34] 85 [6] 101.5 M 500 Multi-lane [31] 14.25 M 20 MS-CapsNet [32] 11.2 M 50 DenseCaps [8] 16 M 100 HitNet [29] 8.89M 250 Residual Capsule Network [14] 11.86M 120 ER-Caps 9.4 M 70 ER-Caps needs fewer epochs to converge (Fig. 7) than the baseline CapsNet, except on the CIFAR-100 dataset.…”
Section: Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%