1997
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1096-9861(19970519)381:4<500::aid-cne9>3.0.co;2-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GABA- and glycine-immunoreactive projections from the superior olivary complex to the cochlear nucleus in guinea pig

Abstract: Retrograde transport of horseradish peroxidase was combined with immunocytochemistry to identify the origins of potential gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) -ergic and glycinergic inputs to different subdivisions of the cochlear nucleus. Projection neurons in the inferior colliculus, superior olivary complex, and contralateral cochlear nucleus were examined, but only those from the superior olivary complex contained significant numbers of GABA- or glycine-immunoreactive neurons. The majority of these were in perio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
68
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
7
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The contralateral inhibition of cells in the L SO, which occurs via fast conducting axons and powerf ul synapses, has a minimum latency of Ïł4.3 msec [Joris and Yin (1998); group delay Ï© acoustic delay], and estimates based on first spike latency using tones with 2.5 msec rise time are longer, at values ÏŸ6 msec (Tsuchitani, 1997). Considering (1) the extra distance to the DC N, (2) the longer rise time used here (4 msec), (3) the lack of evidence for any known fast-conducting inhibitory pathway from the superior olivary complex to the C N, and (4) the extensive projections from periolivary cell groups to the C N (Ostapoff et al, 1997) and the generally longer latencies that are recorded in periolivary regions (Tsuchitani, 1977), it is unlikely that the short-latency contralateral inhibition of DC N would be derived through a link in this complex.…”
Section: Response To Contralateral Stimulationmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The contralateral inhibition of cells in the L SO, which occurs via fast conducting axons and powerf ul synapses, has a minimum latency of Ïł4.3 msec [Joris and Yin (1998); group delay Ï© acoustic delay], and estimates based on first spike latency using tones with 2.5 msec rise time are longer, at values ÏŸ6 msec (Tsuchitani, 1997). Considering (1) the extra distance to the DC N, (2) the longer rise time used here (4 msec), (3) the lack of evidence for any known fast-conducting inhibitory pathway from the superior olivary complex to the C N, and (4) the extensive projections from periolivary cell groups to the C N (Ostapoff et al, 1997) and the generally longer latencies that are recorded in periolivary regions (Tsuchitani, 1977), it is unlikely that the short-latency contralateral inhibition of DC N would be derived through a link in this complex.…”
Section: Response To Contralateral Stimulationmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Various descending projections to the CN exist (Conlee and Kane, 1982;Brown et al, 1988;Weedman and Ryugo, 1996;Ostapoff et al, 1997), and an estimate of the latency and time course of the contralateral inhibition may narrow down the possible sources involved. We presented a contralateral stimulus during the sustained portion of the response to long ipsilateral CF tones in 10 type IIIÏ©IV cells.…”
Section: Response To Contralateral Stimulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of course, the DCN receives inhibitory inputs from a variety of loci in the superior olive (Ostapoff et al, 1997) and inferior colliculus (Shore et al, 1991;Malmierca et al, 1996), which could provide the additional inhibitory input. At present, nothing is known about the notch noise responses of these neurons, except for the type O units in the inferior colliculus, which show responses to rising band edges (Davis et al, 2003) and could provide the additional inhibitory input, either directly or indirectly.…”
Section: The Additional Inhibitory Inputmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transmission electron microscopic studies corroborated these findings by showing that these small terminals enclose flattened vesicles, which are thought to contain inhibitory transmitters (Cant 1991;Osen and Ottersen 1996). The GABAergic terminals may originate from neurons in the ventral nucleus of the trapezoid body (Ostapoff et al 1997), which themselves receive excitatory input from axon collaterals of globular bushy cells . The superior paraolivary nucleus, in which most neurons label for GABA, might provide another source of GABAergic input to the MNTB (Helfert et al 1989).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%