It is shown that unconventional nature of superconducting state of PrOs 4 Sb 12 , a Pr-based heavy electron compound with the filled-Skutterudite structure, can be explained in a unified way by taking into account the structure of the crystallineelectric-field (CEF) level, the shape of the Fermi surface determined by the band structure calculation, and a picture of the quasiparticles in f 2 -configuration with magnetically singlet CEF ground state. Possible types of pairing are narrowed down by consulting recent experimental results. In particular, the chiral "p"-wave states such as p x + ip y is favoured under the magnetic field due to the orbital Zeeman effect, while the "p"-wave states with two-fold symmetery such as p x can be stabilized by a feedback effect without the magnetic field. It is also discussed that the double superconducting transition without the magnetic field is possible due to the spin-orbit coupling of the "triplet" Cooper pairs in the chiral state.Recently, the superconductivity has been found in heavy electron compound PrOs 4 Sb 12 with the crystal structure of the filled Skutterudite [1]. Since the specific heat jump ∆C at the superconducting transition temperature T c =1.8K is quite enhanced as ∆C/T c ≃ 500 mJ/K 2 mole, heavy quasiparticles are responsible for the Cooper pair formation. Quite recently, a measurement of the longitudinal relaxation rate, 1/T 1 , of NQR at Sb site has been performed and very unusual temperature (T ) dependence was revealed both for T < T c and T > T c [2], while the normal state properties had been known to be also quite unconventional [1,3]. Unconventional behaviors of 1/T 1 are summarized as follows: 1) Pseudo gap behavior is seen in 1/T 1 T at T c < T < 2T c , in which the resistivity ρ also shows a pseudo-gap behavior [1]. 2) There is no trace of the coherence (Hebel-Slichter) peak around T = T c at all. 3) 1/T 1 appears to exhibit an exponential T -dependence below 1.3T c , giving the superconducting gap ∆ in the low temperature limit as 2∆/k B T c ≃ 5.3, although a possibility is not ruled out that the crossover to the T 3 -dependence begins to be observed at around T ≃ T c /3 the lowest temperature covered by experiments.Very recently, the anomaly of specific heat near T c has been observed, which suggests a double transition at T = T c1 and T c2 (T c2 < T c1 ) [3,4] It also turned out very recently on the basis of measurements of the angular dependence of the thermal conductivity κ under the magnetic field H [5] that there exsist at least two different superconducting phases in the T -H phase diagram. In the low-field phase, the 2-fold component of κ z along the z-direction is observed as a function of the angle of the direction of H around the z-axis, while the 4-fold one is observed in the high-field phase. The phase boundary approaches the lower critical temperature T c2 as H → 0. This is in marked contrast with the case of a heavy electron superconductor CeCoIn 5 where the data can be interpreted by a simple "d"-wave model [6]. These behaviors s...