2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2012.05.053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GA Optimization of the Coupled Climate Model of an Order Two of a Greenhouse

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The accuracy of the models reported in the bibliography varies considerably. Thus, the model InverSim validated for a 12-day period with a thermal amplitude of T i =3-52ºC (Bouzo et al, 2006) obtained lower accuracy (RMSE=3.9 °C; R 2 =0.88) than models validated with lower thermal amplitudes and time intervals, such as the models used by Lammari et al (2012) and Hasni et al (2011) with climatic data for a period of a week in France, obtaining RMSE=1.05 °C (T i =14-27 ºC) and mean absolute error MAE=1.24 ºC (T i =15-32 ºC). Other models, such as MICGREEN (Singh et al, 2006), were validated using only one day of measurements (T i =14-28 ºC), obtaining values of RMSE=5.69 ºC for inside air, RMSE=3.21 ºC for soil surface temperature, RMSE=3.91 ºC for cover temperature and RMSE=3.70 ºC for canopy temperature.…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The accuracy of the models reported in the bibliography varies considerably. Thus, the model InverSim validated for a 12-day period with a thermal amplitude of T i =3-52ºC (Bouzo et al, 2006) obtained lower accuracy (RMSE=3.9 °C; R 2 =0.88) than models validated with lower thermal amplitudes and time intervals, such as the models used by Lammari et al (2012) and Hasni et al (2011) with climatic data for a period of a week in France, obtaining RMSE=1.05 °C (T i =14-27 ºC) and mean absolute error MAE=1.24 ºC (T i =15-32 ºC). Other models, such as MICGREEN (Singh et al, 2006), were validated using only one day of measurements (T i =14-28 ºC), obtaining values of RMSE=5.69 ºC for inside air, RMSE=3.21 ºC for soil surface temperature, RMSE=3.91 ºC for cover temperature and RMSE=3.70 ºC for canopy temperature.…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Hasni et al (2011) used a digital simulation based genetic algorithm (GA) and a particle swarm optimization (PSO) procedure to improve the physical sizes of the model of Boulard et al (1996). Lammari et al (2012) also employed the GA technique to optimize a nonlinear model of an environmental greenhouse.…”
Section: Empirical Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lammari et al (2012) use a GA to determine the parameters of a greenhouse model with the aim of optimise both the temperature and vapour pressure. Simulation results were based on data collected in a greenhouse located in France for a tomato crop culture.…”
Section: Review Of Nabi Metaheuristics For Greenhouse Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The GA parameters for the optimization process are exposed in Table 1: Comparisons between actual measurements inside the greenhouse and the MIMO model are exposed in the Figure 4, 5, 6 and Figure 7. The final optimum parameters system settings are enumerated in the (Table 2) [21].…”
Section: Objective Function Of Gamentioning
confidence: 99%