2008
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-87700-4_107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GA-Net: A Genetic Algorithm for Community Detection in Social Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
231
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 376 publications
(246 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
231
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We can we find that when there is higher similarity between nodes (nodes are initialized as populations in this paper), the fitness value is larger [22]. When designing CD fitness values, the simple strategy using the Euclidean distance or Jaccard similarity is not enough [43,44]. It should be noted that similarity of network nodes is closely related to factors [45] such as number of common neighbor nodes, local influence of nodes, direct or indirect connected edge, topic correlation network, etc.…”
Section: Fitness Function Of Community Detectionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We can we find that when there is higher similarity between nodes (nodes are initialized as populations in this paper), the fitness value is larger [22]. When designing CD fitness values, the simple strategy using the Euclidean distance or Jaccard similarity is not enough [43,44]. It should be noted that similarity of network nodes is closely related to factors [45] such as number of common neighbor nodes, local influence of nodes, direct or indirect connected edge, topic correlation network, etc.…”
Section: Fitness Function Of Community Detectionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…One is the standard for testing quality, and the other is used as the objective function [43]. Although Q functions are limited in resolution [28] and extreme degradation [31], they are widely used by researchers.…”
Section: Community Optimization Incremental Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [9], particle swarm optimization was applied to detect community structures, and experimental results showed that the isolated nodes can be detected with increased ease. A genetic algorithm (GA) developed in [31] to solve the community detection problem with a single-objective function based on community score; the quality of the detected community structures was better than that of the previous GA approaches. A GA approach was also proposed in [15] to solve the community structure detection problem with a multi-objective function, improving the single-objective function designed in [31].…”
Section: Detection Of Community Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A genetic algorithm (GA) developed in [31] to solve the community detection problem with a single-objective function based on community score; the quality of the detected community structures was better than that of the previous GA approaches. A GA approach was also proposed in [15] to solve the community structure detection problem with a multi-objective function, improving the single-objective function designed in [31]. The k-means algorithm was first adopted by [22] to find an initial solution, which considered link length between nodes in a network, and then applied the simulated annealing algorithm to detect community structures.…”
Section: Detection Of Community Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Especially in recent years, the multi-objective evolutionary algorithm must do optimization of the more widely used and studied ones, resulting in a series of novel algorithms and get good application. The multiobjective optimization proposition is generally no unique global optimal solution, so this is actually a multi-objective optimization proposition of the process of seeking a Pareto set [7]. The traditional multi-objective algorithm is often converted into a single objective proposition after the use of a sophisticated single-objective optimization algorithm.…”
Section: Multi-objective Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%