G7 ülkelerinin bilgi performanslarının analizi: COCOSO yöntemi ile bir uygulama

Altıntaş, Furkan Fahri

doi:10.15637/jlecon.8.3.06

Cited by 17 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 41 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The study emphasized the crucial role of higher education in advancing the knowledge economy. Furthermore, Altintaş [7] conducted an analysis ranking the Group of Seven (G7) countries, applying the Combined Compromise Solution (CoCoSo) and entropy methods. The findings were compared with those derived from the Evaluation based on Distance from Average Solution (EDAS), Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), and Gray Relational Analysis (GIA) methods.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…These multifaceted parameters enable a thorough understanding, not merely of the quantitative facets but also of the qualitative and efficiency aspects of knowledge production and utilization within nations. The GKI is designed to assess the informational efficacy of countries, a measure intrinsically linked to both the knowledge economy and the information society [7]. An analysis of EU countries using the GKI provides critical insights into their respective strengths and weaknesses within the knowledge domain, thereby laying the groundwork for the development of strategies and policies aimed at enhancing their competitive edge in the global marketplace.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Evaluating the Knowledge Economies within the European Union: A Global Knowledge Index Ranking via Entropy and CRADIS Methodologies

Puška,

Hodžić,

Štilić

2023

IJKIS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this study, a novel methodology is proposed for ranking the knowledge economies of European Union (EU) countries, leveraging their positioning within the global knowledge index (GKI). The GKI, encompassing seven pivotal indicators, serves as a benchmark for assessing a nation's knowledge economy. The EU, a prominent political and economic conglomerate, forms the focal point of this analysis. A multi-criteria analysis approach is adopted, wherein the Entropy method is utilized to determine the significance of individual GKI indicators. Additionally, the CRADIS (Compromise Ranking of Alternatives from Distance to Ideal Solution) method is employed for the ranking of these nations. The Entropy method, renowned for its efficacy in subjective weight determination, and the CRADIS method, a novel multi-criteria analysis tool yielding results based on deviations from the ideal and anti-ideal solutions, are integrated. This integration is pivotal, as it offers results comparable with other multicriteria methodologies. The analysis reveals that Research Development and Innovation emerges as the most critical indicator. According to the CRADIS method, Sweden is identified as the leading country in terms of GKI indicators, followed by Finland and Denmark. This trend underscores a superior performance of the northern EU countries. Conversely, Eastern EU countries are observed to lag in their GKI standings. These findings are corroborated through comparative and sensitivity analyses, highlighting the influence of normalization on country rankings and pinpointing specific indicators necessitating enhancement for bolstering the knowledge economy. This research not only aids EU countries in identifying their strengths and weaknesses in the realm of knowledge economy but also serves as a strategic guide for policymakers. It provides actionable insights for fostering knowledge economy development, emphasizing the need for strengthening existing advantages and addressing shortcomings. Such strategic initiatives are crucial for enhancing global market competitiveness. The study's outcomes, therefore, offer valuable resources for decision-making in policy and economic development contexts.

show abstract

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluating the Knowledge Economies within the European Union: A Global Knowledge Index Ranking via Entropy and CRADIS Methodologies

Puška,

Hodžić,

Štilić

2023

IJKIS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In According to the results, Sweden is the country that best implements the goals of SD, while Romania is in last place. Altıntaş (2021a) assessed the information performance of the G7 countries based on the values of the components of the Global Knowledge Index (GKI) using the CoCoSo method.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of the Performances of OECD Countries in the Perspective of Socio-Economic Global Indices: CRITIC-Based Cocoso Method

Acar

2022

Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Günümüzde her alanda küreselleşen ve değişen dünyaya uyum sağlamak ülkeler için de bir zorunluluk haline gelmiştir. Özellikle gelişmiş ülkeler, değişimin gerekliliğinin farkına varmışlar ve yönetim anlayışlarını performans ölçümü ve kaynakların etkin/verimli kullanımını temel alarak yenilemişlerdir. Dolayısıyla gelişmiş ülkelerin de yaptığı gibi değişime ayak uydurmak isteyen ülkeler çeşitli alanlardaki performanslarını ve dünya üstündeki yerlerini çeşitli göstergeler yardımıyla izlemelidir. Ülkelerin diğer ülkelerle performanslarını karşılaştırmaya ve birçok alanda global olarak zayıf/güçlü yönlerini görmeye yarayan önemli göstergelerden biri küresel endekslerdir. Bu çalışmada CRITIC tabanlı CoCoSo metodu kullanılarak 2015-2019 yılları arasında OECD ülkelerinin performansları sosyo-ekonomik küresel endeksler çerçevesinde karşılaştırılmıştır. Çalışmada öncelikle CRITIC yöntemi kullanılarak söz konusu endekslere ilişkin ağırlıklar elde edilmiştir. CRITIC metodu sonuçlarına göre tüm yıllar için en büyük ağırlığa sahip olan endeksin GINI endeksi olduğu bulunmuştur. Daha sonra, CRITIC metoduyla elde edilen ağırlıklar kullanılarak OECD ülkelerinin ele alınan küresel endeksler çerçevesinde performansları CoCoSo yöntemi ile karşılaştırılmıştır. Yapılan analizler sonucunda 2015-2019 yılları arasında performansı en iyi olan ülkenin Danimarka ve en düşük olan ülkenin ise Meksika olduğu belirlenmiştir.

show abstract

“…Addressing the problem of selection of logistics centers, M.Yazdani et al used the CoCoSo method integrated with data envelopment to choose among logistics service providers [41]. Altıntaş evaluated the knowledge performances of G7 countries according to the 2020 Global Knowledge Index (GKI) components using CoCoSo [42].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Supplier selection using the integrated MEREC – CoCoSo methods in a medical device company

Özel Sönmez,

Toktaş

2024

Journal of Scientific Reports-A

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The medical device industry is a rapidly developing industry that includes various dynamics. Developed technologies show continuous improvement depending on diagnosis and treatment applications in health services. To keep up with this change and survive in an increasingly competitive environment, medical device manufacturers must be engaged in continuous improvement activities. This situation, necessary for many companies producing in the industrial field, gains even more importance in the medical device sector when the direct impact of product safety and quality on human life is considered. In companies producing medical devices, the legal requirements of the product being a medical device are followed by the notified bodies and authorized authorities within the framework of standards and regulations within the scope of quality processes. Increasing costs and liabilities with MDR 2017/45 have pushed medical device manufacturers to question their methods. In this study, it was determined that customer requests could not be met in a company producing medical devices, and it was observed that delivery times increased. In evaluating the reasons for the increase in delivery time, it was determined that supplier selection could have been carried out more effectively. For this purpose, six suppliers and six criteria were selected because of the company's sector knowledge and the evaluations of the company managers. The Combined Compromise Solution (CoCoSo) method, one of the new generation multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods, is proposed for ranking the suppliers in the supplier selection problem. Method The removal effects of criteria (MEREC) weighting method was used to weight supplier selection criteria. In this study, a new generation supplier selection method application in medical devices has been carried out. Considering the inadequacy of the studies on supplier selection in medical devices, the relevant research will contribute to the literature.

show abstract

G7 ülkelerinin bilgi performanslarının analizi: COCOSO yöntemi ile bir uygulama

Cited by 17 publications

References 41 publications

Evaluating the Knowledge Economies within the European Union: A Global Knowledge Index Ranking via Entropy and CRADIS Methodologies

Evaluating the Knowledge Economies within the European Union: A Global Knowledge Index Ranking via Entropy and CRADIS Methodologies

Comparison of the Performances of OECD Countries in the Perspective of Socio-Economic Global Indices: CRITIC-Based Cocoso Method

Supplier selection using the integrated MEREC – CoCoSo methods in a medical device company

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About