2022
DOI: 10.1093/evolut/qpac005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

G-matrix stability in clinally diverging populations of an annual weed

Abstract: How phenotypic and genetic divergence among populations is influenced by the genetic architecture of those traits, and how microevolutionary changes in turn affect the within-population patterns of genetic variation, are of major interest to evolutionary biology. Work on Ipomoea hederacea, an annual vine, has found genetic clines in the means of a suite of ecologically important traits, including flowering time, growth rate, seed mass, and corolla width. Here we investigate the genetic (co)variances of these c… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In some cases, G differs substantially between populations (Wood and Brodie 2015) and between species (Chakrabarty and Schielzeth 2020). Nevertheless, in many cases the structure of G is stable over relatively long timescales (Arnold et al 2008, McGlothlin et al 2022) and major environmental clines (Henry and Stinchcombe 2023). Our results are consistent with this latter group of studies, showing that the overall structure of G is relatively constant across lineages.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some cases, G differs substantially between populations (Wood and Brodie 2015) and between species (Chakrabarty and Schielzeth 2020). Nevertheless, in many cases the structure of G is stable over relatively long timescales (Arnold et al 2008, McGlothlin et al 2022) and major environmental clines (Henry and Stinchcombe 2023). Our results are consistent with this latter group of studies, showing that the overall structure of G is relatively constant across lineages.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been criticisms and caveats from various standpoints over this research program, including its blindness to mechanistic basis, simplistic assumptions, and uncertainty in the stability of G over pertinent timescales (Pigliucci, 2006;Morrissey et al, 2010;Milocco & Salazar-Ciudad, 2020Henry & Stinchcombe, 2023b). Nevertheless, active research effort exemplifies persistent interest in understanding potential roles of constraints in macroevolutionary Figure 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Together, these lines of studies can be seen as a trend to connect the phenotypic divergence patterns at the inter-population level to the phenotypic variability at the intra-population level. There have been criticisms and caveats from various standpoints over this research program, including its blindness to mechanistic basis, simplistic assumptions, and uncertainty in the stability of G over pertinent timescales (Pigliucci, 2006; Morrissey et al ., 2010; Milocco & Salazar-Ciudad, 2020, 2022; Henry & Stinchcombe, 2023b). Nevertheless, active research effort exemplifies persistent interest in understanding potential roles of constraints in macroevolutionary phenotypic diversification (Polly & Mock, 2018; Watanabe, 2018; Machado, 2020; Renaud et al ., 2021; Rhoda et al ., 2023).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%