2011
DOI: 10.1080/0020739x.2011.562324
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

G.I. Taylor and the Trinity test

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
15
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
3
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1, which shows a remarkable agreement of the data with the theoretical description in Eq. (5). A simple linear fit results in the parameters m = 1.01±0.02 and n = 6.94±0.05, with all the data following a single line confirming the two predictions of Taylor's modeling.…”
Section: Trinity Explosionsupporting
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1, which shows a remarkable agreement of the data with the theoretical description in Eq. (5). A simple linear fit results in the parameters m = 1.01±0.02 and n = 6.94±0.05, with all the data following a single line confirming the two predictions of Taylor's modeling.…”
Section: Trinity Explosionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Nonetheless, most of the inaccuracies appear in the evaluation of a dimensionless factor that cannot be accounted by dimensional analysis. Many of the myths behind this story have been examined in detail by Deakin [5], including comparisons between the work of Taylor [1,4] with lesser known developments in parallel that took place in the U.S. by John von Neumann [6] and in the Soviet Union by Leonid Sedov [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[34], the early cavity growth produced by an explosion at the water surface was described with a potential flow model simplifying to the expression for the radius R 3Ṙ2 = E 0 /ρ, which easily yields the result R(t) ∝ t 2/5 (here we used indistinctly R cav = R). This 2/5 scaling law was established by Taylor for shock wave propagation following a nuclear blast [35], and it was also found during excitation of hard spheres by examining the growth rate of particle collisions in 2D and half-space simulations [36]. Nevertheless, the model considers that the overpressure generated by the explosion relaxes to ambient on a millisecond time scale, shorter than the expansion time of the cavity [t ∼ O(10 −1 s)].…”
Section: Early Cavity Growthmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…An interesting discussion on the limits of the Taylor approach, which obtained some popular success after the successful determination of the (classified) energy of the first atomic bomb tested in 1945 in the Nevada desert (see Figure 2), is reported by Michael A.B. Deakin in Reference [5]. According to Deakin, Taylor's calculation of the Trinity bomb energy [6] (which, in the word of his biographer G.K. Batchelor, caused him to be "mildly admonished by the US Army for publishing his deductions from their (unclassified) photographs" [7]) was indeed overestimated, although by a mere 3% with respect to the calculations that could have been derived by the exact treatment of von Neumann or Sedov.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%