2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11042-020-09270-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

FVSR-Net: an end-to-end Finger Vein Image Scattering Removal Network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To assess the efficacy of Let-Net, we conducted a comparative analysis with the SOTA deep-learning-based FV identification models. The benchmark models include FV_CNN [ 8 ], a reference to a CNN architecture designed for vein identification; Fvras-net [ 9 ], an embedded FV identification system; FV code [ 36 ], a method employing FV code indexing; L-CNN [ 37 ], a lightweight CNN model; ArcVein [ 38 ], which introduces a novel loss function, Arcvein loss; FVSR-Net [ 39 ], a model integrating a bio-optical model with a multi-scale CNN E-Net; S-CNN [ 34 ], a novel shallow CNN model; FVT [ 7 ], a transformer-based deep model with pioneering experiments across nine datasets; L-S-CNN [ 40 ], a lightweight Siamese network with self-attention mechanism; and FVFSNet [ 16 ], a method that concurrently extracts FV features in the spatial and frequency dimensions. Employing EER as a metric, comparative experiments were conducted across the nine public FV datasets outlined in Section 4.1 , with the results presented in Table 1 .…”
Section: Experiments and Results Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To assess the efficacy of Let-Net, we conducted a comparative analysis with the SOTA deep-learning-based FV identification models. The benchmark models include FV_CNN [ 8 ], a reference to a CNN architecture designed for vein identification; Fvras-net [ 9 ], an embedded FV identification system; FV code [ 36 ], a method employing FV code indexing; L-CNN [ 37 ], a lightweight CNN model; ArcVein [ 38 ], which introduces a novel loss function, Arcvein loss; FVSR-Net [ 39 ], a model integrating a bio-optical model with a multi-scale CNN E-Net; S-CNN [ 34 ], a novel shallow CNN model; FVT [ 7 ], a transformer-based deep model with pioneering experiments across nine datasets; L-S-CNN [ 40 ], a lightweight Siamese network with self-attention mechanism; and FVFSNet [ 16 ], a method that concurrently extracts FV features in the spatial and frequency dimensions. Employing EER as a metric, comparative experiments were conducted across the nine public FV datasets outlined in Section 4.1 , with the results presented in Table 1 .…”
Section: Experiments and Results Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pathak et al [26] proposed a CNN image restoration model based on contextual coding in which semantic restoration was achieved by reconstructing the standard pixel loss and adversarial loss to construct image gray values. Du et al [27] and Shand et al [28] used feature semantic compression and fusion to construct a feature network for image recognition, and achieved quite good restoration results on large datasets. However, the finger vein image database that such methods are applied to is small in size and low in resolution, and cannot meet the requirements of deep model training.…”
Section: Finger Vein Image Enhancement Based On Deep Featurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To assess the efficacy of Let-Net, we conducted a comparative analysis with the SOTA deep-learning-based FV identification models. The benchmark models include FV_CNN [8], a reference to a CNN architecture designed for vein identification; Fvrasnet [9], an embedded FV identification system; FV code [36], a method employing FV code indexing; L-CNN [37], a lightweight CNN model; ArcVein [38], which introduces a novel loss function, Arcvein loss; FVSR-Net [39], a model integrating a bio-optical model with a multi-scale CNN E-Net; S-CNN [34], a novel shallow CNN model; FVT [7], a transformer-based deep model with pioneering experiments across nine datasets; L-S-CNN [40], a lightweight Siamese network with self-attention mechanism; and FVFSNet [16], a method that concurrently extracts FV features in the spatial and frequency dimensions. Employing EER as a metric, comparative experiments were conducted across the nine public FV datasets outlined in Section 4.1, with the results presented in Table 1.…”
Section: Comparison and Evaluation With Existing Fv Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%